Local News

<< Previous   of   Next >>   ADVERTISEMENT   CONTACT THE HERALD Robert Frank, City Editor frank@heraldnet.com   Published: Thursday, October 11, 2007 Environmental groups decry county's new ecology rules Wetland and wildlife protections aren't enough, their appeal claims. By Jeff Switzer Herald Writer Environmental groups are challenging Snohomish County's new wetland and wildlife regulations, saying the rules don't go far enough. Futurewise, a group that opposes sprawling housing developments, has filed an appeal of the rules with the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board. The Pilchuck Audubon Society and the Echo-Paradise Community are also named in the appeal of the county rules. The county's new rules do a better job than the former rules of protecting water quality and habitat along shorelines and streams, said Kristin Kelly of Futurewise. However, the new rules are too lax in protections for wetlands, Kelly said. Property owners are allowed to set aside less land around wetlands if they put up a fence or install additional plants. The rule changes vary depending upon the quality and importance of the wetland or habitat. That flies in the face of scientific evidence that a certain amount of land is needed as a protective buffer between housing and wetlands, she said. "We feel it isn't going to protect the land," Kelly said. "We want them to do a better job." Also, the rules protect some wildlife that don't need habitat protection in the county, such as the Larch Mountain salamander and gray whale, she said. However, the rules don't protect the Western toad and golden eagle, which are in the county, she said. "While we don't like to litigate, the county can't just ignore the science," Kelly said. She also said she hopes the board will send the rules back to the county "so we can get these problem areas in an otherwise excellent critical areas ordinance fixed." The rules were late in coming. They were due 2004, but lengthy analysis and public debate pushed adoption of the rules to August. The stricter rules took effect Oct. 1. Landowners rushed to apply for 42 permits the week before the change, setting a record for the most permits applied for in a week for large projects such as subdivisions, homes on a common property and multifamily projects.

1. Good grief! 2. Swine flu lingers, making traditional flu season unpredictable 3. Two vie to serve as Snohomish County prosecutor 4. Last hurrah for Huskies’ Locker? 5. Koster for Congress? He’s still undecided 6. Here’s how home foreclosure sales really work 7. A store credit card can save you cash, but is it worth it? 8. New site sought for Snohomish pool project 9. Families get an early gift: free Christmas trees 10. Prep Roundup: Lake Stevens wins two wrestling meets 2 - Top 10 Stories Most Talked about 3 - Top 10 Stories Most Emailed

• Wildcats fall to familar foe in semis • ‘Nutcracker' times three • Road warrior • Mavericks reloading • Holiday Lightings & Santa Sightings • Cities prepare for winter blast repeat • Wolfpack duo takes last shot at state tourney • This Weekend in Your Town • Tips for the stormy season • Boeing will build, flight test and deliver 787s in South Carolina to spe ... • Snohomish County EDC promoting job growth in key industry clusters • $4 million grant to advance brain tumor research has Everett links • Providence medical center construction tops off its 12-story steel frame ... • Tulalip affordable housing project to be financed by KeyBank, Raymond Ja ... • Arlington's Lak of Ink has a growing following for Luke Kooyman's creati ... • Bank of the Northwest formed • Cascade Bank earns $1.6 million