Local News

<< Previous   of   Next >>   ADVERTISEMENT   CONTACT THE HERALD Robert Frank, City Editor frank@heraldnet.com   Published: Thursday, October 11, 2007 Environmental groups decry county's new ecology rules Wetland and wildlife protections aren't enough, their appeal claims. By Jeff Switzer Herald Writer Environmental groups are challenging Snohomish County's new wetland and wildlife regulations, saying the rules don't go far enough. Futurewise, a group that opposes sprawling housing developments, has filed an appeal of the rules with the Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board. The Pilchuck Audubon Society and the Echo-Paradise Community are also named in the appeal of the county rules. The county's new rules do a better job than the former rules of protecting water quality and habitat along shorelines and streams, said Kristin Kelly of Futurewise. However, the new rules are too lax in protections for wetlands, Kelly said. Property owners are allowed to set aside less land around wetlands if they put up a fence or install additional plants. The rule changes vary depending upon the quality and importance of the wetland or habitat. That flies in the face of scientific evidence that a certain amount of land is needed as a protective buffer between housing and wetlands, she said. "We feel it isn't going to protect the land," Kelly said. "We want them to do a better job." Also, the rules protect some wildlife that don't need habitat protection in the county, such as the Larch Mountain salamander and gray whale, she said. However, the rules don't protect the Western toad and golden eagle, which are in the county, she said. "While we don't like to litigate, the county can't just ignore the science," Kelly said. She also said she hopes the board will send the rules back to the county "so we can get these problem areas in an otherwise excellent critical areas ordinance fixed." The rules were late in coming. They were due 2004, but lengthy analysis and public debate pushed adoption of the rules to August. The stricter rules took effect Oct. 1. Landowners rushed to apply for 42 permits the week before the change, setting a record for the most permits applied for in a week for large projects such as subdivisions, homes on a common property and multifamily projects.

1. Fireworks blamed in house fires; three people injured 2. Mill Creek lawyer pursuing lawsuit for island nation 3. Everett may have to lobby for Lincoln's replacement 4. Mortgage relief slow in coming for strapped homeowners 5. Fireworks blamed in Marysville house fire 6. Fourth proves a day for colors 7. Landlords should read up before they rent out 8. Marysville postpones remodel of high school 9. Officials in fever to keep Boeing 10. Credit card companies cut debtors some slack 2 - Top 10 Stories Most Talked about 3 - Top 10 Stories Most Emailed

• Warriors looking for balance • Three Scots vying for QB slot • Jackson looks for another title • Decorated veteran continues to serve as active volunteer • City Council reviewing sign regulations • Wildcats get a peek at newcomers • Lynnwood still in rebuilding mode • Shoreline feels a kindergarten growth spurt • Leave the patriotic pyrotechnics to professionals, cities urge • Trading dollars for kilowatts New PUD energy conservation programs save ... • By John Wolcott SCBJ Editor • Record crowd at Paine Field’s General Aviation Day as FHC Celebrate ... • Celebration of aviation's history and future presented in multiple venue ... • The time is ripe for small businesses to take no prisoners • EPA proposal to regulate global-warming gases would be costly for small ... • Innovation helps the town of Forks to offset tough economy • Powering the people