Herald Editorial Board

• Bob Bolerjack, Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

• Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@ heraldnet.com

• Allen Funk, Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

• Kim Heltne, Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com
Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

| |
| WEEK IN REVIEW |
 |
| Saturday |
| • |
Fears over commercial air service at Paine Fiel... |
| • |
Gift charity draws Snohomish County families in... |
| • |
Donated safe gives Marysville museum a mystery |
 |
| Friday |


|
| • |
From behind bars, pal tells Colton Harris-Moore... |
| • |
Commercial airlines would cause few problems at... |
| • |
Fund set up to benefit children of couple kille... |
 |
| Thursday |


|
| • |
5 die of swine flu in Snohomish County |
| • |
Red Cross honors acts of heroism, many by ordin... |
| • |
Barista clothing rules delayed by County Council |
 |
| Wednesday |


|
| • |
Father gets 13 years in 6-year-old's fatal shoo... |
| • |
‘One bad choice' blamed in death of 4 fri... |
| • |
Reps. Larsen, Inslee split on Obama's plans for... |
 |
| Tuesday |


|
| • |
Lynnwood swimmer turns therapy into competitive... |
| • |
Highway 9 crash is worst alcohol-related accide... |
| • |
Crash victim warned his students against DUI |
 |
| Monday |


|
| • |
Victims of Highway 9 crash ID'd; suspect booked... |
| • |
Suspect in officer killings eludes law in Seattle |
| • |
New laws for Snohomish County bikini baristas? |
 |
| Sunday |


|
| • |
Extended lack of work takes its toll on Snohomi... |
| • |
Four die in car crash near Marysville |
| • |
Gathering in Tacoma mourns slain Lakewood officers |
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
Editorials
|
|
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
| |
 |
| HAVE YOUR SAY |
| Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. |
| You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. |
| Send it to: |
| E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com |
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206 |
| Fax: 425-339-3458 |
| Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472). |
| |
Published: Sunday, March 2, 2008
Air Force has a whole lot of explaining to do
This isn't over yet.
The U.S. Air Force's stunning announcement Friday that it had chosen a European manufacturer over the Boeing Co. to supply 179 aerial refueling tankers raised far more questions than it answered. Boeing and Congress, among others, must demand that every such question be addressed thoroughly.
Beyond the obvious "What the #$@&! were they thinking?[""], we'd like to know:
n Why would the U.S. military hand Europe a huge economic stimulus package? Especially to a company -- EADS and its Airbus subsidiary -- that the U.S. government has repeatedly accused of taking unfair and illegal government subsidies that allow it to launch new commercial lines free of the market risks Boeing is used to taking.
By handing Airbus a $35 billion victory, the Air Force will also give it a better competitive foothold in the commercial aviation market by helping it establish a manufacturing operation within our own shores -- in Mobile, Ala. That's where some engineering and assembly of the Airbus tanker would take place, but make no mistake: the bulk of the KC-45A will be built in Europe. These will not be American planes. That's why in Paris, EADS CEO Louis Gallois is proclaiming the deal a "fabulous victory."
n Given the dollar's weakness against the Euro, how is buying a European product cost-effective for U.S. taxpayers?
n How can we be sure that this isn't a "makeup call" from the 2003 tanker scandal involving Boeing and Air Force officials?
n How did the Air Force's recent decision to change criteria it used to assess rival bids affect the process?
n Size apparently mattered, according the Air Force's description of Airbus' larger A330 platform. Accordingly, was Boeing given ample opportunity to base its tanker on the larger 777 rather than the 767?
n Creation of U.S. jobs wasn't a factor in the decision, Air Force officials insisted Friday. EADS and its business partner, Northrop Grumman, apparently thought it would, though. How else to explain the effort to sweeten its bid by having final assembly take place in Mobile? Without that carrot, does anybody really believe the decision would have gone the way it did?
This is one of the largest U.S. military contracts ever awarded, and it's probably just the first of three similar orders for tankers over several decades. A strong, experienced and innovative American company with a highly skilled American workforce shouldn't have its bid tossed aside in favor of a foreign competitor without a thorough, compelling and convincing explanation.
We look forward to that.
|
| 2
- Top 10 Stories Most Talked about |
| 3
- Top 10 Stories Most Emailed |
|
|
|
|
|