Heraldnet.com
SUNDAY, JULY 5, 2009 12:08 am
ADVERTISEMENT

LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Blog
The Buzz
What, me worry?
Your town news
Kristi O'Harran
Columnist Kristi O'Harran writes about people in Snohomish County.
•Latest: This year, Poochapalooza is for dogs and dancers
Latest gallery

ForestFire Paintball
June 27. 2009 (10 photos)
[More Herald photos]
 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Saturday


Fireworks blamed in Marysville house fire
Sailors for a day: Naval Station Everett opens ...
Edmonds backs off red-light cameras
Friday
Armed man shot by deputies in Arlington
Police ID make of vehicle in fatal hit-and-run
Boeing's 6-month tally: 1 net order
Thursday


One fire rips through $2 million home, another ...
Swine flu claims 2nd victim in Snohomish County
Jetty Island firefight continues; hot weather ...
Wednesday


Fire District 1 negotiates to take over service...
Snohomish County population rising fast since 2...
Honey's owners indicted by feds
Tuesday


Mobile home tenants along Snohomish River told ...
Lincoln to leave Everett in 2013
Put on your sailor's cap and explore Naval Stat...
Monday


Disabled people will be left without a ride
You'll soon have 4,500 reasons to trade in that...
Pay hike deserved, Monroe chief says
Sunday


1,670 local students in county are without homes
Monroe's business gets done in secret
$9 million to be sought for U.S. 2 in federal t...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Local News   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
CONTACT THE HERALD
Robert Frank, City Editor
frank@heraldnet.com
 
Published: Tuesday, June 24, 2008

U.S. Supreme Court to rule on Navy's use of sonar

The justices agree to review rulings that limited sonar use because of risks to marine mammals.

The question of how much the U.S. Navy should be restricted in using sonar around marine mammals will now go to the highest court in the land.

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed Monday to the Bush administration's request to review recent court rulings that limit the Navy's use of the technology.

The Navy says sonar is critical to national security. Environmental groups point to evidence that Navy sonar has killed whales, dolphins and porpoises, which use their own type of sonar to communicate.

An injunction by a federal judge in Los Angeles early this year created a 12-nautical-mile no-sonar zone along the coast and ordered the Navy to shut off all sonar use within 1.25 miles of a marine mammal.

The Bush administration then asked for an exemption while it appealed the case. In February, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco upheld the lower court ruling but relaxed the restrictions to begin the sonar shutdown within 1,000 meters, or a little more than half a mile, of a marine mammal. Sonar must be completely shut down if the animal is within about an eighth of a mile.

Those are the restrictions under which the Navy is currently operating.

The Supreme Court is expected to hear the case in October.

The Navy already has 29 safeguards in place and is spending $18 million per year on research on the health of marine mammals, said Sheila Murray, environmental public affairs officer for the U.S. Navy in Bangor.

"The Navy needs to train in environments equal to those they could be called to fight in," Murray said. "We need to train the way we fight."

Five environmental groups, led by the Natural Resources Defense Council, are suing the Navy over sonar. They don't believe the Navy does everything it can to prevent harm to marine animals.

"I think proper mitigation requires dedicating areas and training during times when marine mammals are not as abundant or not in the area," said Ken Balcomb, a marine biologist with the Center for Whale Research, based in Friday Harbor. "That can be done with adequate monitoring."

The Everett-based destroyer USS Shoup found itself in hot water over the issue five years ago. Environmentalists said the Shoup's sonar caused a mass stranding of marine mammals in Haro Strait, between Vancouver Island and San Juan Island, in May 2003. A subsequent study by the Navy found no relationship between the ship's sonar and the deaths.

The Navy admitted, however, that its sonar caused the death of 17 marine mammals in the Bahamas in 2000. The Navy has determined that its sonar is responsible for five strandings and 37 deaths of marine mammals since 1996, Murray said.

Many of the animals that died in 200 were beaked whales, located in a deep ocean valley, where environmentalists say the mammals are especially vulnerable to echoes from the sonar.

"That echo chamber just amplifies the vibrations," said Howard Garrett, director of the Orca Network, based on Whidbey Island.

"Those intense soundwaves reverberate in any air pocket, which includes the ear canals and the lungs, and that causes abrasions and bleeding. Literally, it's ear-piercing," Garrett said.

This causes the animals to panic and rise to the surface too fast, and they get the bends, he said.

Balcomb believes the ruling has caused the Navy to cut back on its training exercises in the Puget Sound area, especially around where marine mammals congregate.

Not so, said the Navy's Murray. She said the Navy's precautions have been in place for several years. These include using passive sonar to listen for the animals, extensive training for personnel in spotting marine mammals, use of night thermal imaging equipment, and "safety zones" around which the sonar is shut off.

"We're good stewards; we take pride in that," she said.

Still, it's important that the Navy be able to track silent diesel electric submarines, of which about 300 are employed by 41 countries, she said.

Murray pointed out an incident two years ago in which a Chinese sub surfaced within torpedo range of the USS Kitty Hawk aircraft carrier near the Japanese island of Okinawa. Beijing claimed the sub was in international waters and was not stalking the carrier, which was taking part in a naval exercise.

"This is one of the reasons why we need to use active sonar," Murray said.

The environmental groups say there's a difference between training and a legitimate threat.

"In times of war, they'll always have the ability to say, 'This is an emergency,' " Balcomb said. "That's not what we're talking about. We're talking about routine practices. They can carefully avoid this, and they choose not to."

Reporter Bill Sheets: 425-339-3439 or sheets@heraldnet.com.

1. Waves wash away Explosion's title hopes
2. You've got your pick of Fourth of July fun
3. Snohomish entrepreneur bounces back with new venture
4. Inslee downplays fears Boeing will send second 787 line elsewhere
5. Popular park changing hands
6. Deputies shoot armed man near Arlington
7. Why, governor?
8. Edmonds backs off red-light cameras
9. Vehicle that killed girl was Chevy Astro minivan
10. Arlington buys up more water rights
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Warriors looking for balance
Three Scots vying for QB slot
Jackson looks for another title
Decorated veteran continues to serve as active volunteer
City Council reviewing sign regulations
Wildcats get a peek at newcomers
Lynnwood still in rebuilding mode
Shoreline feels a kindergarten growth spurt
Leave the patriotic pyrotechnics to professionals, cities urge
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT