Heraldnet.com
THURSDAY, JANUARY 8, 2009 5:49 pm
ADVERTISEMENT

LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Blog
Jerry Cornfield
Is the P-I for sale?
Your town news
Julie Muhlstein
Columnist Julie Muhlstein's take on life in Snohomish County.
•Latest: Marysville man's 1948 Ford tractor a bit of Elvis history
Kristi O'Harran
Columnist Kristi O'Harran writes about people in Snohomish County.
•Latest: Don't forget a little wave for neighbors
Latest gallery

Flood Photos
January 7. 2009 (27 photos)
[More Herald photos]
 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Wednesday


Woman dropped from a size 22 to a size 0
Record flooding possible in county
Prosecutors state their case that girl was brut...
Tuesday


New product safety law a blow to shops
Hoax claims 'ridiculous,' Minutemen leader says
Deadly Everett fire's cause still elusive
Monday


Why are the white pines dying?
Many arrested for DUI said last drink served at...
Wondering how clean your favorite eatery is?
Sunday


One dead in Everett fire
Snowfall in county not expected to last
Friends mourn loss of 'Mr. Lake Roesiger'
Saturday


Violent attacks in home sparked by politics, vi...
No trial in death of crash victim; family outraged
It's a dangerous time to go hiking in backcountry
Friday


Pilchuck plunge rules: Jump in, dash out, shiver
Computer and TV recycling now free
Providence Hospice plans are put on hold
Thursday


State's minimum wage increases 48 cents today
Device gives DUI suspects driving option
Dozens out of work at county, more cuts to come
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Local News   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
CONTACT THE HERALD
Robert Frank, City Editor
frank@heraldnet.com
 
Published: Wednesday, November 19, 2008

County Council hikes charge on storm water

EVERETT -- Some property owners in Snohomish County will see a steep increase in storm water fees next year.

The County Council approved the fee increases Monday.

The fee hikes are in response to new federal rules aimed at reducing, or keeping to a minimum, the runoff from oil- and exhaust-coated pavement that runs into Puget Sound.

"I don't like the charge. But my biggest objection, as you said, is the people are paying the increase without being told about it ahead of time," said Max Albert of Lynnwood. "That means there's no debate."

The fees will increase from $33.01 to $90 for single-­family parcels in unincorporated areas not included in cities' urban growth areas, and from $65 to $122 for single-family parcels within those areas. The fees are assessed on property tax bills.

For condominiums, the fee will rise from $29.71 to $81 outside the growth areas and from $61.71 to $113 inside the growth areas.

Farms and owners of commercial property will see similar increases, percentage-wise, based on formulas corresponding to the size and number of buildings and amount pavement on the property, respectively.

Some cities are also considering increases in response to the new federal rules, which require local jurisdictions to step up both their maintenance of catch basins and retention ponds and their inspections of commercial property.

The County Council voted 3-2 to approve the increases. Councilman Mike Cooper said the county, which is already planning layoffs in response to the economic downturn, doesn't have the money to meet the requirements without the fee.

"The taxpayers are going to pay for it one way or another," he said. "Either the state's going to raise a fee to pay for it or we're going to raise a fee to pay for it. I guess I would call it a social responsibility for us all to share the cost of clean water."

In addition to the cleaning and maintenance, the fee pays for watershed management, restoration of salmon habitat, education programs, groundwater monitoring and a ­program to reduce pet waste.

This year, with the increase, they'll also pay for groundwater monitoring, work on environmentally sensitive areas and staff support for a volunteer Marine Resources Committee.

Councilman John Koster was among those who voted no. While the state and the federal government have given $10 million to $12 million over the past three or four years to local jurisdictions to help them gear up for the changes, the county is already spending $6 million a year on storm water programs and the new requirements will add more than $11 million a year, Koster said.

He said he doesn't doubt the programs have value, but if the state and the federal government are going to require them, they should pay more for them.

"We're willing to do them, but show me the money," Koster said.

Reporter Bill Sheets: 425-339-3439 or sheets@heraldnet.com.

READER COMMENTS
Be the first to comment.
You must be a registered user and verify your e-mail address to post comments to blogs or articles on HeraldNet.

To register, click here. To read other terms and conditions, click hereLog out

1. Threat of severe flooding as more roads are closed
2. Woman dropped from a size 22 to a size 0
3. Prosecutors state their case that girl was brutally raped
4. Kyle Beach's Silvertips career comes to sudden end
5. Record flooding possible in county
6. Record flood level developing on Stillaguamish River
7. Rising waters in Gold Bar behave in odd ways
8. Boy, 6, drives to school after missing bus
9. Silvertips players 'shocked' by Beach deal
10. Marysville man's 1948 Ford tractor a bit of Elvis history
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Archbishop boys beat King's for first time in school history
Becoming 'a new person'
20 vie for council vacancy
The poet speaks
Quieting the mind
Students of the Month
T-Wolves survive slow start, beat M-P
T-birds' Michaels on track for state titles
The senior center limbo
The Enterprise Online Newspaper

TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes


ADVERTISEMENT