Opinion Columnists

<< Previous   of   Next >>   ADVERTISEMENT   HAVE YOUR SAY Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. Send it to: E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com Mail: Letters section The Herald P.O. Box 930 Everett, WA 98206 Fax: 425-339-3458 Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472).   Published: Wednesday, October 7, 2009 Proposed ‘bill of rights’ straight out of Wonderland By Richard S. Davis Wherever you live, you will want to pay attention to a quietly revolutionary issue on the Spokane ballot next month. A group of left-leaning activists, union members and environmentalists pooled their wish lists into “a community bill of rights” that they propose as Proposition 4, amending the city charter. The package, put forward by a group called Envision Spokane, combines fantasy and hubris, the unconstitutional and the unenforceable. The amendment creates an expansive and expensive bundle of vague new rights, high-minded rhetoric redolent of the contemporary conceit that good intentions trump the law. Take a deep breath and bear with me. Residents would have the right to “a locally-based economy,” “affordable preventive health care,” “affordable and safe housing,” and “affordable and renewable energy.” They’d also have the right to “determine the future of their neighborhoods.” Having fulfilled the au courant progressive agenda, Envision Spokane turns to organized labor’s top priorities. Workers would have “the right to be paid the prevailing wage and the right to work as apprentices on certain construction projects,” extending a bad public law to private contracts. And, they would have “the right to employer neutrality when unionizing and the right to constitutional protections within the workplace.” That last bit is a local version of the unconstitutional Worker Privacy Act pushed by labor in Olympia last legislative session. And, to leave literally no one and no thing out, the “natural environment” is granted the “right to exist and flourish.” Giving the natural environment standing in court is one thing, giving wetlands and tree frogs a voice is another. Absent Dr. Dolittle and the Lorax, anyone will be empowered to file a lawsuit on behalf of the ecosystem. Finally, Prop. 4 solves the enforcement problem by making everyone an enforcer. As Envision Spokane puts it: “Any person, neighborhood, or neighborhood council ... could file a lawsuit to enforce their rights.” What that means, of course, is that all of these dubiously aggregated and undefined rights will be the subject of endless litigation. Alice, the White Rabbit and a host of hookah-smoking characters could not produce a more gauzy and chimerical platform. The plan, however, flows not from the pipe dreams of Sixties hippies, but channels the thinking of Thomas Linzey, a lawyer whom Forbes magazine profiled in 2007 as pushing “wild law” to give “trees, rivers, mountains and all the little critters that live in them ... rights just like the people.” Linzey is also a leader in efforts to strip businesses of their legal rights, a perspective incorporated by Prop. 4. In a 2007 interview with Global Exchange, Linzey griped that the Founders got it wrong. “We got rid of the King,” he told the interviewer, “but we didn’t get rid of an English structure of law that placed property and commerce over the rights of communities and nature.” He sees himself in the civil disobedience tradition of the abolitionists and civil rights activists. He wants nothing less than a constitutional re-write “to change the DNA of this country.” As silly as a lot of this sounds, no one should underestimate the forces behind Prop. 4. The movement is a serious threat. The Lilac City is just a test case. Rich Hadley, head of Greater Spokane Incorporated, says his board voted unanimously to oppose Prop. 4. “We want people to have health care, roofs over their head,” he says. “We’re very conscious of our environment. It’s a big part of why people come here. ... (But) this was so far out in left field there wasn’t anyone who could see a benefit in it passing.” It’s doubtful that Prop. 4 could survive legal challenges. It violates the “single-subject rule,” a constitutional problem that has caused the Washington Supreme Court to invalidate several statewide initiatives. And other provisions run afoul of the federal constitution. But, as Hadley points out, an electoral victory in Spokane — even if subsequently overturned in court — would embolden proponents, who would quickly take this sideshow on the road. “Our goal is to defeat it soundly,” he says. We count on our friends in Spokane to stuff this idea back through the looking glass. It doesn’t belong in the real world. Richard S. Davis writes on public policy, economics and politics. His e-mail address is richardsdavis@gmail.com. READER COMMENTS Log in or register to post new comment | Log out Save Our Spokane Campaign I appreciate you covering this disturbing proposal which is on the ballot in Spokane, WA. I am the campaign manager for "Save Our Spokane," which is on the ground fighting Prop 4. One thing for folks to realize is that Spokane County will have no voter's pamphlet, and so most voters will only read a real warm and fuzzy ballot title, but not any of the details. This is why their is a danger of this passing. If anyone would like to follow our campaign, you can visit www.saveourspokane.com Thank you, Michael Cathcart Campaign Manager Save Our Spokane info@saveourspokane.com Michael Cathcart | Oct 7, 2009 9:09 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal

1. I-5 crash injures Washington State Patrol trooper 2. Map of Everett in 1893 a gift to Northwest Neighborhood residents 3. Marysville 's Electric Lights Parade goes dark 4. Lynnwood couple’s fight ends in woman’s arrest 5. Mill Creek church uses tattoos to teach 6. Does today’s Huskies-Cougars Apple Cup or Sunday’s Seahawks-Rams NFL game merit your attention? 7. Fire rips through Everett paintball arena 8. Contest inspired by ‘Biggest Loser' helps Mill Creek neighbors 9. Everett building rules may be loosened 10. Brown paper bags for fans 2 - Top 10 Stories Most Talked about 3 - Top 10 Stories Most Emailed

• Ruling in the pool • Holiday Lightings & Santa Sightings • Archbishop Murphy takes title • A season of performing arts • Budget numbers have official fuming • Wildcats move on to 2A semifinals • Holiday Bazaars & Fairs Calendar • Edmonds’ Westgate Chapel serves up hospitality for holiday • Mavericks fall • Boeing will build, flight test and deliver 787s in South Carolina to spe ... • Snohomish County EDC promoting job growth in key industry clusters • $4 million grant to advance brain tumor research has Everett links • Providence medical center construction tops off its 12-story steel frame ... • Tulalip affordable housing project to be financed by KeyBank, Raymond Ja ... • Arlington's Lak of Ink has a growing following for Luke Kooyman's creati ... • Bank of the Northwest formed • Cascade Bank earns $1.6 million