Herald Editorial Board

• Bob Bolerjack, Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

• Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@ heraldnet.com

• Allen Funk, Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

• Kim Heltne, Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com
Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

| |
| WEEK IN REVIEW |
 |
| Saturday |
| • |
Fire rips through Everett paintball arena |
| • |
Everett building rules may be loosened |
| • |
Contest inspired by ‘Biggest Loser' helps... |
 |
| Friday |
| • |
Trooper rear-ended by suspected drunk driver no... |
| • |
Democrats split over choice for Snohomish Count... |
| • |
Thanksgiving tradition flourishes at Everett ch... |
 |
| Thursday |


|
| • |
Truck crash near Marysville ties up northbound ... |
| • |
When taggers strike in Everett, city picks up t... |
| • |
Kids talk turkey: What Thanksgiving is all about |
 |
| Wednesday |
| • |
County law could change to allow guns in parks |
| • |
Boy, 16, admits role in Sultan slaying of teen |
| • |
Swift buses ready for fast lane |
 |
| Tuesday |


|
| • |
Father guilty of manslaughter in girl's death |
| • |
Snohomish County budget passes, with a caveat |
| • |
Soldier with ties to Marysville killed in Afgha... |
 |
| Monday |


|
| • |
Economy may silence Everett Symphony's season |
| • |
Inmates with mental illness bring extra costs t... |
| • |
Help with heating bills late to arrive this year |
 |
| Sunday |


|
| • |
Nurse seeks help healing hidden wounds of wars |
| • |
Count drags on long after the election's over |
| • |
Groups work to help those in uniform |
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
Commentary
|
|
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
| |
 |
| HAVE YOUR SAY |
| Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. |
| You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. |
| Send it to: |
| E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com |
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206 |
| Fax: 425-339-3458 |
| Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472). |
| |
Published: Tuesday, October 13, 2009
GUEST COMMENTARY / DOMESTIC VIOLENCE LAWS
Biggest civil rights roll-back since Jim Crow era
By Mark Mahnkey
Have you, or a person you know, ever been falsely accused of domestic violence? Targeted with a restraining order? Put in jail?
Each year more than 1 million Americans are hit with a false or trivial accusation of partner abuse. It’s now reached the point that domestic violence laws represent the largest roll-back in Americans’ civil rights since the Jim Crow era!
Our nation’s domestic violence laws have gone too far, harming innocent citizens and diverting scarce resources away from the true victims.
Respect for civil rights is deeply embedded in our national conscience, and constitutionally guaranteed civil liberties form the foundation of our legal system. Unfortunately, these rights have been eroded in the past 15 years by an array of domestic violence laws. For years Americans accepted these civil-rights violations, assuming they were an unfortunate but necessary byproduct of the national effort to curb intimate partner abuse. But it has now become clear that the harmful effects of domestic violence laws far exceed any abuses that may occur.
As a result of our nation’s domestic violence laws, 2 million to 3 million restraining orders are issued each year, often without any allegation of physical violence. As a result, persons lose access to their children, homes and financial assets, often their jobs, frequently their friends, with devastating social and financial consequences. One million persons are arrested each year for allegations of domestic violence. But the allegations are often recanted and the evidence doubtful as evidenced by fewer than 5 percent of cases actually being prosecuted in Superior Court in Snohomish County, leaving 95 percent of the arrests unjustified.
This is not particularly surprising, when one considers the government’s position.
When we offered to present peer-reviewed and published academic research to a major metropolitan county’s sheriff deputies on this subject, the sheriff responded with “No thanks, I prefer my people are indoctrinated by industry insiders.”
Both the Children’s Services division of the Department of Social and Health Services, and the State Department of Commerce (formerly Commerce, Trade and Economic Development) supported financially a recent Washington State Coalition Against Domestic Violence (WSCADV) annual conference in Wenatchee, where invited speaker Amanda McCormick, an employee of Praxis International, said with a grin, “I think I know a lot of men who deserve to be beaten,” during her keynote address. This under banners reading “There’s no excuse for domestic violence” and “Refuse to abuse.” So, I guess the domestic violence industry believes there are exceptions to their oft-stated slogans.
Domestic violence laws violate constitutional protections found in the First Amendment (right to assembly and to free speech); Second Amendment (right to bear arms), Fourth Amendment (probable cause for arrest), Fifth Amendment (due process) and Fourteenth Amendment (equal treatment under the law). These civil rights violations have a disproportionate harmful effect on low-income minority communities.
The Fourth Amendment, for example, protects innocent Americans by requiring evidence of probable cause before an arrest can be made. But domestic violence laws that “mandate” arrest like those here in Washington ignore constitutional guarantees and set aside the rights of the falsely-accused.
Harvard economist Radha Iyengar analyzed the impact of mandatory arrest in 15 states. Her surprising conclusion was reported in the Aug. 7, 2007 edition of The New York Times: “intimate partner homicides increased by about 60 percent in states with mandatory arrest laws.” Why do mandatory arrest laws place persons at greater risk of future violence? Because many victims want their partner to attend relationship classes or get substance abuse treatment, not be thrown in jail. So rather than calling for help, these persons opt to endure the abuse — sometimes with fatal results.
The verdict is in. American taxpayers have spent millions of dollars to implement must-arrest policies around the country. And the verdict is clear — these policies:
-- Trample on constitutional protections.
-- Place victims at greater risk of violence.
-- Divert limited funds away from the real victims.
Must-arrest laws are an example of a well-intended policy leading to unintended consequences. It’s time to restore civil liberties, respect for victims, and common sense to our nation’s domestic violence laws.
Mark Mahnkey served on the faculty at Washington State University and is director of Public Policy for the Washington Civil Rights Council. He can be reached at mark@wacrc.org.
|
| 2
- Top 10 Stories Most Talked about |
| 3
- Top 10 Stories Most Emailed |
|
|
|
|
|