Herald Editorial Board

• Bob Bolerjack, Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

• Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@ heraldnet.com

• Allen Funk, Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

• Kim Heltne, Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com
Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

| |
| WEEK IN REVIEW |
 |
| Saturday |
| • |
Fire rips through Everett paintball arena |
| • |
Everett building rules may be loosened |
| • |
Contest inspired by ‘Biggest Loser' helps... |
 |
| Friday |
| • |
Trooper rear-ended by suspected drunk driver no... |
| • |
Democrats split over choice for Snohomish Count... |
| • |
Thanksgiving tradition flourishes at Everett ch... |
 |
| Thursday |


|
| • |
Truck crash near Marysville ties up northbound ... |
| • |
When taggers strike in Everett, city picks up t... |
| • |
Kids talk turkey: What Thanksgiving is all about |
 |
| Wednesday |
| • |
County law could change to allow guns in parks |
| • |
Boy, 16, admits role in Sultan slaying of teen |
| • |
Swift buses ready for fast lane |
 |
| Tuesday |


|
| • |
Father guilty of manslaughter in girl's death |
| • |
Snohomish County budget passes, with a caveat |
| • |
Soldier with ties to Marysville killed in Afgha... |
 |
| Monday |


|
| • |
Economy may silence Everett Symphony's season |
| • |
Inmates with mental illness bring extra costs t... |
| • |
Help with heating bills late to arrive this year |
 |
| Sunday |


|
| • |
Nurse seeks help healing hidden wounds of wars |
| • |
Count drags on long after the election's over |
| • |
Groups work to help those in uniform |
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
Opinion Columnists
|
|
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
| |
 |
| HAVE YOUR SAY |
| Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. |
| You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. |
| Send it to: |
| E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com |
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206 |
| Fax: 425-339-3458 |
| Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472). |
| |
Published: Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Washington shouldn’t say no to schools innovation
By Richard S. Davis
The $4.35 billion Race to the Top Fund provides a powerful incentive for Washington to join the education mainstream. More discretionary money than the feds have ever made available, the funds will be awarded to states to spur and support eduction reform. To the White House, much to the consternation of its erstwhile fans in the teachers’ unions, reform includes charter schools.
Where the unions see a threat, Washington charter school advocates recognize an opportunity.
Fawn and Jim Spady have been this state’s indefatigable charter school champions. This year, they’ve launched Kids First Washington to promote charter school legislation in the 2010 session.
“We’re trying to build the largest coalition ever to support the ... legislation,” Fawn Spady says. “People who want to put kids first.” She believes the state stands to gain $200 million to $400 million in federal money.
We’ve been here before. Washington voters have rejected charter school proposals at the ballot three times since 1996.
Fortunately, there’s no three-strikes-and-you’re-out limit on good ideas. Reformers rarely succeed at their first at-bat. Perseverance and persuasive powers eventually pay off. And, sometimes, as now, circumstances conspire to hand you an offer too good to refuse.
In an op-ed last July, Education Secretary Arne Duncan made clear his intent to use the fund to shape state policy. The money will be released in two stages, “allowing first-round losers to make necessary changes and reapply.”
Duncan also wrote, “states that ... cap the number of charter schools, will be at a disadvantage.” Charter schools are alternative public schools — not private schools — set up by teachers and parents. Freed of much of the regulation and bureaucracy, charter schools face the same accountability standards plus a market test. If they fail to perform, they go out of business.
Currently, Washington caps the number of charter schools at zero. Gov. Chris Gregoire told Northwest Public Radio last month that she thinks the criteria are “too narrow,” adding that charter schools are not the “be-all, the end-all.”
No. They’re simply a choice we should have and don’t. There’s nothing radical or unproven about them. Currently, 1.4 million students are being educated in the 4,600 charter schools operating in 40 states and the District of Columbia. Just 10 states, including Washington, ban them.
Sounding a bit like Gregoire, the National Education Association faults the administration for concluding “that charter schools are the only answer to what ails America’s public schools.” Perversely, in the next paragraph, they “urge the administration to ... embrace the diversity of choices available to students, parents, school districts, and states.”
So the NEA supports a “diversity of choices,” as long as all the alternatives wear the union label. (Charter school teachers often don’t belong to a teachers’ union.) The NEA’s state affiliate opposed charter measures on the ballot here in 1996 and 2004, taking no position on the initiative in 2000.
Money may not be enough to win them over. A year ago, the Washington Education Association cost seven schools in our state $13.2 million in grant money from the National Math and Science Initiative because the grant required merit pay for the teachers involved.
With the state facing multi-billion-dollar budget shortfalls in the years ahead, the group may want to reconsider its recalcitrance.
Meanwhile, the evidence of charter school success continues to mount. A recent study of New York City schools compared the performance of students who won a lottery to attend charter schools with other applicants who landed in the traditional system. Citing the research, the Washington Post editorial board concluded, “Opponents of charter schools are going to have to come up with a new excuse. They can’t claim any longer that these non-traditional public schools don’t succeed.” The charter school students scored higher on math and reading tests. The longer they attended, the better they did.
If Washington ends up a “first-round loser” later this year, the 2010 Legislature will have millions of reasons to embrace charter schools to qualify for second-round funding. But even if we somehow get the money, they should act swiftly to join the mainstream. Charter schools make good sense.
Richard S. Davis writes on public policy, economics and politics. His e-mail address is richardsdavis@gmail.com.
|
| 2
- Top 10 Stories Most Talked about |
| 3
- Top 10 Stories Most Emailed |
|
|
|
|
|