Heraldnet.com
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009 6:50 am
LocalNorthwestNation & WorldPoliticsSpecial ReportsPhotosColumnistsMultimedia 
Blog
Amy Rolph
'Dorm room' entrepreneur wins global competition
Blog
Amy Rolph
Edmonds-based Forward Mobility wins $50,000 grant
Mike Benbow
Business editor Mike Benbow's insights into all things business.
•Latest: When the customer is wrong and a jerk
Steve Tytler
Steve Tytler answers your questions about real estate.
•Latest: Novice real estate investors can lose their shirts
 
WEEK IN REVIEW
Sunday
Lotto ticket worth $6.5 million sold in Lake St...
Count drags on long after the election's over
Nurse seeks help healing hidden wounds of wars
Saturday


Nearly 30 kids adopted during annual event in S...
Gold Bar couple admit animal cruelty in puppy m...
Arlington area man's arrest in alleged burglar'...
Friday


Victim of alleged burglary now a suspect in kil...
Couple pleads guilty in Gold Bar puppy mill case
Nearly 2,000 turn out for Stevens Pass opening day
Thursday


Safety long a concern for road involved in fata...
State budget's $2 billion hole will require dee...
County considers building for disaster response...
Wednesday


Jury will decide accident or murder in girl's s...
Marysville rejects idea of a much later start f...
Flu’s full force shocks an Edmonds man an...
Tuesday


Year in jail for fired principal who kidnapped ...
State senator's ex-in-law threatened to kill hi...
$2 billion short, state will find tax talk hard...
Monday


Friends mourn 2 killed in Lynnwood crash
'No Child' law sees more students transferring ...
"Nutcracker" is link to family history for 6-ye...
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Business   Print This Article  Email This Page  Subscribe Now! facebook digg reddit del.icio.us fark stumble

 
ADVERTISEMENT

 
CONTACT THE HERALD
Mike Benbow, Business Editor
benbow@heraldnet.com
 
Published: Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Obama gets pro-Boeing message

WASHINGTON — A bipartisan group of lawmakers who support Boeing in its bid for a $35 billion tanker contract want President Barack Obama to force the Air Force to include a recent World Trade Organization ruling against Airbus in its decision.

The WTO in September issued an interim ruling that found Airbus received illegal launch aid from European governments to build its aircraft. Los Angeles-based Northrop Grumman Corp. and Airbus parent European Aeronautic Defense and Space Co. NV are competing against Chicago-based Boeing for the third time to replace 179 aging Air Force refueling tankers.

In a letter Monday, Reps. Jay Inslee, D-Wash., Todd Tiahrt, R-Kan., and 37 other Boeing supporters pressed Obama to find a way for the Air Force to account for the WTO ruling. A separate ruling on a European Union counter-complaint against the U.S. is expected in a few months.

“It is clear that the illegal subsidies Airbus received gives it an unacceptable advantage in the tanker competition, and we would be remiss if we did not address this inequity,” Inslee said in a statement.

A White House spokesman did not immediately respond to requests for comment Monday afternoon.

The Air Force, which has put the tanker competition as its top acquisition priority, has maintained that the WTO’s ruling is irrelevant to the tanker competition and should be excluded from its final decision.

Northrop and Airbus are offering a tanker based on the Airbus A330. Boeing may offer its 767-based tanker, a larger 777-based tanker, or both.

“The EU complaint against Boeing has yet to be heard so the most fair, open and transparent position that can be taken is to allow the WTO process to play itself out rather than rushing to a ‘half-judgment,”’ Northrop spokesman Randy Belote said in a statement.

Northrop supporters, including Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., have said the latest competition favors Boeing because of the Air Force’s decision to omit risk when evaluating certain factors, like whether bidders can stay on schedule or keep price promises.

The Pentagon has tried and failed twice to award a contract to replace its Eisenhower-era fleet of tankers that refuel military planes in flight. The last attempt in early 2008 awarded to Northrop and Airbus was overturned on appeal and led Pentagon leaders to temporarily revoke the Air Force’s authority to award a contract. The 2004 award to Boeing was undone by an ethics scandal that resulted in prison terms for a former company executive and a former high-ranking Air Force official.

The tanker deal — one of the largest in Pentagon history — is the first of three contracts worth up to $100 billion to replace nearly 600 aircraft over the next 30 years.

READER COMMENTS
Log in or register to post new commentLog out
it should be Boeing
The Tanker should be Boeing, they have built tankers and know how to!! let alone security and US jobs ! Airbus consortium has not built one, thier's would be a prototype like the 787 is...

Though the board of directors need to oust McNerny, kight and Carson as they are liers and cant be trusted as you see by this deal they have been making between WA and SC, lying to Washington State, the Union that was trying to work with them. If the leaders of Boeing cant be trusted we will loose it again like back in '04. It has hurt the stock ! the way they just dump money with no common sense but to screw everyone that has supported the company for years. This leadership is wrong and cant be trusted !

Mark Davis | Nov 3, 2009 12:17 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
the billion dollar Boeing bailout that has become the biggest military procurement scandal in decades. The 256-page report chronicles how senior Pentagon officials let Boeing play by a different set of procurement rules
Ashdown
202.546.8500 x110

TCS Statement on Inspector General Tanker Report

Washington, D.C. – The following is a written statement by Keith Ashdown, Vice-President of Policy of Taxpayers for Common Sense on the IG Tanker report:

Taxpayers for Common Sense commends the Inspector General for this comprehensive study of the K-767 Tanker deal, the billion dollar Boeing bailout that has become the biggest military procurement scandal in decades. The 256-page report chronicles how senior Pentagon officials let Boeing play by a different set of procurement rules in attempting to award them this unprecedented sweetheart deal. The report also implicates numerous other military officials and throws cold water on the lone gunman theory that Darleen Druyun is entirely to blame for this mess. If that were true, we could close this case once and for all, but the report suggests that the deal had far deeper roots, and we are now left with more questions than answers.

We now know that at the highest levels of the Pentagon and the White House, the wheels were greased to direct billions in corporate welfare to the Boeing despite there being virtually no evidence that there was an immediate need to replace the current tanker fleet. However, because the names of military officials, Boeing officials and lawmakers were redacted from the report, we still don’t know everyone that was involved. This overzealous use of the Sharpie marker to redact key portions of the report does a disservice to the nation by leaving federal taxpayers in the dark.

It is also disappointing that the Inspector General did not take more time to interview Edward Aldridge. Mr. Aldridge is the most senior official implicated in the tanker hubbub. A few phone calls and certified letters are not enough; Aldridge was in a position to know more than anyone else that has been implicated, and he alone can fill-in some of the remaining information gaps. Taxpayers have lost faith in how the military purchases weapons systems. The concern is that defense contractors run the show and there is no one that is ready to hold them accountable for their actions. This report could have changed that belief. The aggressive redaction of significant portions of the report and the softball interview process spoiled this golden opportunity to eliminate the cloud of controversy surrounding the military's acquisition process.

thomas h | Nov 9, 2009 11:01 pm | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal
(No heading)
Frankly, there need be only these considerations. Protection of taxpayer monies and our military technology and security. There is absolutely no solid good reasoning behind allowing Airbus to have any part of this deal. They have already stated a desire to make tankers for other countries from this design and can you imagine if they were building them in the US for sale to say, Iran??? Please.
CC At the Big B | Nov 3, 2009 12:35 am | 0 replies | View all | Post reply | Request removal

1. City of Everett, neighbor sued over lost trees, mudslide
2. Three-car accident closes Highway 9
3. Kennedy’s assassination remains a puzzling memory
4. Ways to Give: How you can help in your community
5. Take a look under your seat
6. Novice real estate investors can lose their shirts
7. Kwan never golden, but sometimes transcendant
8. Lotto ticket worth $6.5 million sold in Lake Stevens
9. Canceled credit cards come as a shock for some
10. Count drags on long after the election's over
Enterprise Newspaper Snohomish County Business Journal
Eat local this Thanksgiving
Mavericks moving on
Canada's Great Big Sea rolls into Edmonds
A. Murphy finishes 2nd in volleyball
Art Walk features music, demonstrations
EAT LOCAL: Getting the goods
Lynnwood HS history teacher Vic Bennet dies
Wildcats head to semis
CSO Chamber annual show slated Nov. 23
The Enterprise Online Newspaper


Lube, Oil & Filter
Buy 1 - Get 1 FREE

Oil - Snohomish County
Low Prices - Fill Now!

25% off Bath & Groom
New Customers

FREE 6 lb. Pad w/
30yd Carpet Purchase

$1 off French Dip
$4.99 Burger Basket

$5 OFF
Lunch or Dinner

$5 Off
Stylecut

20% Off Dinner
Up to $75 Value!

$2 OFF
at Box Office

15% Off
All Repairs!
TODAY'S TOP JOBS
 View All Top Jobs 
Top Cars
Top Homes

ADVERTISEMENT