Herald Editorial Board

• Bob Bolerjack, Opinion Editor
bolerjack@heraldnet.com

• Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer
cmacpherson@ heraldnet.com

• Allen Funk, Herald Publisher
funk@heraldnet.com

• Kim Heltne, Assistant to the Publisher
heltne@heraldnet.com
Send letters to the editor by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206.

| |
| WEEK IN REVIEW |
 |
| Saturday |
| • |
Fire rips through Everett paintball arena |
| • |
Everett building rules may be loosened |
| • |
Contest inspired by ‘Biggest Loser' helps... |
 |
| Friday |
| • |
Trooper rear-ended by suspected drunk driver no... |
| • |
Democrats split over choice for Snohomish Count... |
| • |
Thanksgiving tradition flourishes at Everett ch... |
 |
| Thursday |


|
| • |
Truck crash near Marysville ties up northbound ... |
| • |
When taggers strike in Everett, city picks up t... |
| • |
Kids talk turkey: What Thanksgiving is all about |
 |
| Wednesday |
| • |
County law could change to allow guns in parks |
| • |
Boy, 16, admits role in Sultan slaying of teen |
| • |
Swift buses ready for fast lane |
 |
| Tuesday |


|
| • |
Father guilty of manslaughter in girl's death |
| • |
Snohomish County budget passes, with a caveat |
| • |
Soldier with ties to Marysville killed in Afgha... |
 |
| Monday |


|
| • |
Economy may silence Everett Symphony's season |
| • |
Inmates with mental illness bring extra costs t... |
| • |
Help with heating bills late to arrive this year |
 |
| Sunday |


|
| • |
Nurse seeks help healing hidden wounds of wars |
| • |
Count drags on long after the election's over |
| • |
Groups work to help those in uniform |
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
Editorials
|
|
| |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
| |
 |
| HAVE YOUR SAY |
| Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. |
| You’ll need to include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We’ll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. |
| Send it to: |
| E-mail: letters@heraldnet.com |
Mail: Letters section
The Herald
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206 |
| Fax: 425-339-3458 |
| Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson (cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472). |
| |
Published: Monday, November 9, 2009
IN OUR VIEW / COKE AND FAMILY PHYSICIANS
Dr. Pepper will see you now
In a country where ketchup is considered a vegetable, it makes perfect sense that the Coca-Cola Co. has joined in a “consumer alliance” with the American Academy of Family Physicians to sponsor advice on sugar-free alternatives to soft drinks.
The grant, an unspecified “six-figure” amount, will be used to provide recommendations on FamilyDoctor.org. Wow. Six figures of recommendations. That's a lot of influence, er, advice.
The agreement is the first in AAFP's new consumer alliance program, designed to diversify the academy's funding sources beyond the pharmaceutical industry, according to Medical Marketing and Media magazine's Web site.
Better to spread the unholy alliances around, rather than let drug companies dominate the field.
Academy CEO Dr. Douglas Henley insists these deals won't influence the group's public health messages.
Reassuringly, doctors who don't have “CEO” as part of their titles beg to differ.
Dr. William Walker, public health officer for Contra Costa County in California, likened the alliance with ads decades ago in which physicians said mild cigarettes are safe, the Associated Press reported. Walker, a member of the academy for 25 years, quit because of the Coke deal.
In a protest letter to Henley, 22 health specialists and activists questioned the safety of artificial sweeteners and urged the academy to abandon the deal and speak out against sugary drinks “in the strongest language.”
A Coke spokeswoman said such criticism “misses the point of the partnership, which is to provide education based on sound science.”
Examples of that science can be found on Coke's Web site, which also notes that “there are over 700 low- and no-calorie beverages in our portfolio.” But don't confuse the product information with the hard science.
Under the heading “Sweetener Myths”: “There are all sorts of rumors, myths and urban legends about low-calorie sweeteners. It is sometimes hard to separate fact from fiction about safety and health...”
No surprise, artificial sweeteners are declared safe. Don't mind concerns of scientists who disagree.
Coke also wants consumers to know we are “literally” born with a “sweet tooth”; even cavemen craved sweets. Coke says good health is achieved through a balanced diet and moderation, which is true. But stating “There is no such thing as a ‘bad' food or beverage” is wrong.
A sugar-laden soft drink is bad. It has no redeeming nutritional value and sugar is responsible for so many current ills. Which is why Coke has 700 non-sugary products along with the sugary ones. Entering into a “consumer alliance” with the American Academy of Family Physicians is simply good, cover-your-bases business. But really bad medicine.
|
| 2
- Top 10 Stories Most Talked about |
| 3
- Top 10 Stories Most Emailed |
|
|
|
|
|