Pacific Northwest climate scientist is among key contributors to debate

PORTLAND, Ore. — Phil Rasch is a thoughtful guy with unruly hair and a quick smile who’s at home in the clouds — pondering the chemistry behind cloud formation and translating it into atmospheric models.

As the first chief climate scientist for the Pacific Northwest National Labs, he’s also one of the key climate specialists the world is relying on as it decides whether to combat climate change.

That puts him and his research findings at the center of a world drama this week as the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark, proceeds.

Rasch, 57, is convinced we need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to keep global temperatures in a safe range.

In 2007, he signed the Bali Climate Declaration with 200 other climate scientists urging world leaders to act quickly to keep a lid on carbon emissions. He’s tinkered with the idea of reducing warming by producing sulfate particles in the sky.

But the work of climate scientists is under fire as never before.

Polls indicate fewer Americans in the past year believe the evidence behind global warming. Among Republicans and independents, the decline has been particularly steep.

And more than a thousand e-mails hacked from the Climatic Research Unit of England’s University of East Anglia have exposed scientists to allegations of gaming results to favor a global warming hypothesis. The center’s director, Phil Jones, stepped down last week in the wake of the “Climategate” scandal.

At his relatively remote perch in eastern Washington, Rasch has escaped that storm. But he agrees the controversy comes at a bad time.

“I think the accusations will be resolved with time,” he said. “But it won’t happen by Copenhagen.”

Science in the clouds In the bigger picture, Rasch’s work, focused on clouds and climate models, also targets two of the most hotly debated aspects of the global warming issue.

Clouds, it turns out, could increase or decrease as the planet warms, and their presence could boost global warming or reduce it.

It depends where they lie in the atmosphere. It depends on the size of their water droplets and ice particles. It depends on how they interact with airborne particles, or “aerosols,” that could rise or fall in the future, from sulfate spewed by coal plants to the minerals that drift when farmers plow their land.

Climate models, based on thousands of calculations cranked through far-flung supercomputers, are behind U.N. projections of a 4- to 10-degree Fahrenheit increase in the globe’s average surface temperature by 2100 if we continue to rely heavily on fossil fuels.

The 2007 Bali declaration from climate scientists urged keeping warming below 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit. Above that level, Rasch says, we could hit “tipping points” that accelerate warming, including sea ice disappearing and frozen Arctic methane being released as the ground that holds it warms.

Increases in carbon emissions are “like being on a teeter totter,” Rasch said. “Putting a small weight on one side or the other can tip the balance. That’s the thing to worry about.”

Rasch grew up mostly in Seattle, getting sold on deep science as a University of Washington undergraduate, when he helped study ice movements in the Arctic by floating around on an ice sheet for three months.

As a postdoctoral student in the early 1980s, he studied atmospheric models, discovering that the simplifying assumptions made in the models were swamping the real-world physics behind clouds.

Rasch worked for 28 years at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colo. The models he helped develop have been used in assessments by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — the target of global warming critics worldwide.

From his sunny office at the Department of Energy’s National Laboratory complex in Richland, he’s now trying to improve the models with results from the lab’s cloud and airborne particulate research.

That research includes monitoring clouds in airplanes and mountaintops and creating simulated clouds in earthbound laboratories. It also includes helping to adjust the roughly 1 million lines of computer code, calculations and assumptions behind the Community Atmospheric Model that he and roughly 20 other scientists have built over two decades.

The latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, in 2007, tapped 23 different climate models to reach its findings. It concluded that warming of the climate is “unequivocal,” based on temperature records, rising sea levels and “widespread” melting of snow and ice.

Among its other “robust” findings: Manmade greenhouse gas emissions rose by 70 percent between 1970 and 2004. And continued emissions at or above current rates will cause further warming and changes to the 21st-century climate that would “very likely” be larger than those observed in the 20th century.

Those potential changes include rising sea levels, more extreme weather and reduced snowpack and water supplies in some regions.

Rasch stresses that the IPCC work includes extensive critiques, with every criticism tracked and addressed.

“This is a far more stringent process than any other scientific endeavor,” he said. “The more you look at it, the more you see that it’s a trustable process.”

The models do a good job of gauging basic temperature patterns over ocean and land — a crucial variable for global warming, Rasch says.

They’re less solid when it comes to other changes, including the influence of clouds. The 2007 IPCC report pegged cloud feedbacks on the climate system and the impacts of sulfur and other airborne “aerosols” among “key uncertainties.”

“You can state with absolute certainty if nothing else changed and you increase carbon dioxide the atmosphere will warm,” Rasch said. “The issue is really that other things do change as well, and you have to factor them in.”

Researchers test the models against historical climate data to see if they spit out credible results, and each of Rasch’s papers end with critiques of remaining weaknesses in the model. That’s fodder for critics. It’s also one of the basic tenants of science to identify holes in a hypothesis, Rasch says.

The models aren’t flawless, he says, but they’ve improved dramatically.

“We know our (climate) models are imperfect,” Rasch said. “It’s possible we’re all wrong. But the models are all pointing in one direction. The prudent thing to do is to assume that they’re right but continue to test them.”

Another challenge: The complexity of climate scientists’ work makes gauging the truth awfully tough for lay people.

Here’s an excerpt from a 2006 paper Rasch co-wrote on the latest iteration of the Community Atmospheric Model:

“The physical parameterizations have been completely separated from the dynamical core, and the dynamics can be coupled to the physics in a time-split or process-split approximation.”

Got that?

Piling an economic crisis on top of that head-scratching complexity hasn’t helped when it comes to making global warming a priority.

Neither has the tougher questioning of the general climate scientists’ consensus, from a smaller cohort of skeptical scientists and from pundits who allege that climate scientists exaggerate threats to rake in research money.

“I don’t know how to deal with it, to tell you the truth,” Rasch said.

“You can always say that the people you’ve deputized to take care of a problem are all in league with each other to get more research dollars,” Rasch said. “To me, they’re just doing their jobs.”

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Local News

A firefighter stands in silence before a panel bearing the names of L. John Regelbrugge and Kris Regelbrugge during the ten-year remembrance of the Oso landslide on Friday, March 22, 2024, at the Oso Landslide Memorial in Oso, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
‘Flood of emotions’ as Oso Landslide Memorial opens on 10th anniversary

Friends, family and first responders held a moment of silence at 10:37 a.m. at the new 2-acre memorial off Highway 530.

Julie Petersen poses for a photo with images of her sister Christina Jefferds and Jefferds’ grand daughter Sanoah Violet Huestis next to a memorial for Sanoah at her home on March 20, 2024 in Arlington, Washington. Peterson wears her sister’s favorite color and one of her bangles. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
‘It just all came down’: An oral history of the Oso mudslide

Ten years later, The Daily Herald spoke with dozens of people — first responders, family, survivors — touched by the deadliest slide in U.S. history.

Victims of the Oso mudslide on March 22, 2014. (Courtesy photos)
Remembering the 43 lives lost in the Oso mudslide

The slide wiped out a neighborhood along Highway 530 in 2014. “Even though you feel like you’re alone in your grief, you’re really not.”

Director Lucia Schmit, right, and Deputy Director Dara Salmon inside the Snohomish County Department of Emergency Management on Friday, March 8, 2024, in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
How Oso slide changed local emergency response ‘on virtually every level’

“In a decade, we have just really, really advanced,” through hard-earned lessons applied to the pandemic, floods and opioids.

Ron and Gail Thompson at their home on Monday, March 4, 2024 in Oso, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
In shadow of scarred Oso hillside, mudslide’s wounds still feel fresh

Locals reflected on living with grief and finding meaning in the wake of a catastrophe “nothing like you can ever imagine” in 2014.

Everett mall renderings from Brixton Capital. (Photo provided by the City of Everett)
Topgolf at the Everett Mall? Mayor’s hint still unconfirmed

After Cassie Franklin’s annual address, rumors circled about what “top” entertainment tenant could be landing at Everett Mall.

Everett
Everett man sentenced to 3 years of probation for mutilating animals

In 2022, neighbors reported Blayne Perez, 35, was shooting and torturing wildlife in north Everett.

The Washington State University Snohomish County Extension building at McCollum Park is located in an area Snohomish County is considering for the location of the Farm and Food Center on Thursday, March 28, 2024 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Year-round indoor farmers market inches closer to reality near Mill Creek

The Snohomish County Farm and Food Center received $5 million in federal funding. The county hopes to begin building in 2026.

Dorothy Crossman rides up on her bike to turn in her ballot  on Tuesday, Aug. 1, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Everett leaders plan to ask voters for property tax increase

City officials will spend weeks hammering out details of a ballot measure, as Everett faces a $12.6 million deficit.

Starbucks employee Zach Gabelein outside of the Mill Creek location where he works on Friday, Feb. 23, 2024 in Mill Creek, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Mill Creek Starbucks votes 21-1 to form union

“We obviously are kind of on the high of that win,” store bargaining delegate Zach Gabelein said.

Lynnwood police respond to a collision on highway 99 at 176 street SW. (Photo provided by Lynnwood Police)
Police: Teen in stolen car flees cops, causes crash in Lynnwood

The crash blocked traffic for over an hour at 176th Street SW. The boy, 16, was arrested on felony warrants.

The view of Mountain Loop Mine out the window of a second floor classroom at Fairmount Elementary on Wednesday, Jan. 10, 2024 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
County: Everett mining yard violated order to halt work next to school

At least 10 reports accused OMA Construction of violating a stop-work order next to Fairmount Elementary. A judge will hear the case.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.