Attorneys for the worlds largest retailer announced the decision in court on the eve of a trial that would have put Pulitzer Prize winning historian James McPherson on the witness stand. He was to testify that a portion of the site 60 miles southwest of Washington, D.C., was a nerve center for the Battle of the Wilderness.
Wal-Mart, which had weathered two years of criticism by preservationists over the site, did not elaborate on its decision to withdraw plans for the store one day before the trial was to begin.
We just felt it was the right thing to do, said William Wertz, a spokesman for the Arkansas retailer. He said the company would seek another location in Orange County and compensate the county for its expenses in defending its decision to approve the store.
An industry analyst said Wal-Marts decision was based on practical business reasons and harks back to founder Sam Waltons credo that Wal-Mart should never build a store where it isnt wanted.
Burt Flickinger of Strategic Resource Group said it is rare for Wal-Mart to back away from a store once it has researched a location and settled on a site. But they may have wanted to avoid a continuing public relations hit at a time of disappointing sales and increased competition.
To the companys credit they decided to do something different, said Flickinger, who said he is a Wal-Mart shareholder.
While clearly surprised by the decision, preservationists celebrated the turnaround and said the decision signals their resolve to protect Americas heritage.
I hope this sends a message not only to Wal-Mart but to other developers that the preservation community is willing to fight for historic sites, said Robert Rosenbaum, an attorney for residents and the preservation group.
Rosenbaum said he believed that the planned testimony by McPherson was key to the decision.
On the historic issues, we believe we would have won, he said.
The 143,000-square-foot store planned by the Bentonville, Ark.,-based retailer would have been outside the limits of the protected national park where the core battlefield is located. The company had argued the area was already dotted with retail locations and zoned for commercial use.
The Orange County Board of Supervisors in August 2009 approved the special use permit Wal-Mart needed to build the store. The National Trust for Historic Preservation, residents who live within three miles or less of the site and a group that maintains an historic estate on the battlefield challenged the approval.
MORE HBJ HEADLINES
China moves to accept imports of all US apple varieties Everett Clinic to lease space in Frontier Building Boeing, SpaceX will beat Russia on price for astronaut rides Employers: Agreement on key issue in port labor dispute Milk industry fights back against Ďanti-dairy folksí WikiLeaks slams Google over delay in revealing US warrants
Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.