A case of executive overreach

Our state’s public records act leans heavily in favor of disclosure, and for good reason. It was enacted by voters in 1972 as an expression of their insistence on open government.

Under that law, records produced or held by government — official documents, memos, emails, databases, audio recordings, etc. — are open to the public unless another law specifically exempts it.

Among those exemptions are certain government deliberations, such as policy recommendations made by subordinates to agency heads before a policy decision is made. The idea behind that exemption, which the state Supreme Court has narrowly accepted, is to avoid harming an agency’s legitimate deliberative or consultive process. But the court has set tight boundaries around it, in keeping with the law’s spirit of openness.

Gov. Chris Gregoire’s administration thinks state law allows a broader exemption for its internal communications. It says the state Constitution inherently contains an “executive privilege” that allows the governor to conceal records at her own discretion.

The Olympia-based Freedom Foundation asked to see records relating to Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement proposals, medical marijuana legislation, and the Columbia River hydro-electric system. The governor’s office denied its requests, asserting executive privilege. The Freedom Foundation sued.

Siding with the governor, Thurston County Superior Court Judge Carol Murphy turned public records law on its head in April, ruling not only that executive privilege exists, but that someone requesting a record the governor claims is privileged carries the burden of proving otherwise.

The Freedom Foundation has appealed to the state Supreme Court. This is an important principle that needs a high-court ruling.

Executive privilege isn’t explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. The open records act, however, is quite clear about its intent:

“The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know.”

The act, and court rulings that have interpreted it, also make clear its strong pro-disclosure approach. For the governor to assert power to decide what will or won’t be disclosed flies in the face of that long-established principle. At minimum, the burden of showing a government record should be hidden from public view should rest with the government, with a court making the ultimate decision.

The state’s highest court is being asked to defend a principle of openness that the people have long claimed. It’s being asked to do so by rejecting a specious assertion of executive power which undermines that very principle.

It should take this opportunity to underscore Washington’s commitment to open government.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Stethoscope, glasses and calculator on financial documents close up.
Editorial: Follow through on promise of medical price clarity

Hospitals aren’t fully complying with laws on price transparency, including three in Snohomish County.

FILE -- A pharmacy in Rohnert Park, Calif., Sept. 17, 2015. Federal regulators spent billions of dollars to avoid a spike in costs for older Americans that could have been politically damaging to the presidential campaign of Vice President Kamala Harris. (Ramin Rahimian/The New York Times)
Comment: Why patients are losing patience

Here are five of the most frustrating health insurer tactics and what’s keeping them in place.

Herald, reporters, journalism need support

In today’s world, access to trustworthy and reliable local news is more… Continue reading

Buck’s American Cafe graciously provided meeting space

The Kidney Auxiliary of Puget Sound, also know as KAPS, wants to… Continue reading

Comment: App store accountability would aid parent’s oversight

The proposed law would require age verification before apps could be downloaded onto youths’ phones.

Comment: Sale of your doctor’s practice could cost you more

Hospitals are using a loophole to buy up practices, allowing them to charge more for the same service.

A person vaping in New York, July 7, 2024. Millions of Americans use e-cigarettes — there’s little research into how to help them stop. (Justin J Wee/The New York Times)
Editorial: Protect state’s youths from flavored vapes, tobacco

With federal regulation likely ending, the state should bar an addictive, dangerous product.

Comment: Red ribbons for Christmas, yes; red tape, no

Federal and state lawmakers need to rein in the plethora of regulations strangling the economy.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Dec. 22

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Forum: Veterans, others need alternatives in pain management

Opioid prescriptions can easily lead to addiction. Congress can encourage non-addictive options.

Forum: As Mukilteo diversifies, ts DEI panel works to value all

Its work, funded by a few thousand dollars, encourages conversations about an inclusive Mukilteo.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.