Smart Shopper
The Herald of Everett, Washington
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up  Green editions icon Green editions

Calendar


HeraldNet Headlines
HeraldNet Newsletter Delivered to your inbox each week.


Published: Wednesday, December 21, 2011, 12:01 a.m.

Payroll tax increase generates GOP infighting

Biweekly paychecks will be about $40 smaller. Many jobless benefits also are scheduled to expire.

WASHINGTON _ The Senate is gone, the House is packing up, and for now that means working Americans will see their taxes rise in January.
After weeks of bitter partisan wrangling, the Capitol emptied for the holidays with no sign of negotiation toward a compromise that would save an expiring tax break. As of Jan. 1, the payroll tax cut that has been in place all year is scheduled to return to 6.2 percent from its current 4.2 percent, meaning that biweekly paychecks on average will be $40 smaller. Long-term unemployment benefits for 3 million people also are poised to expire, and doctors face an estimated 20 percent cut in Medicare payments.
Facing that unpleasant reality, Republicans fell into an angry family feud over their strategy. Several GOP senators who face re-election next year accused their House GOP colleagues of acting irresponsibly. The House voted to disagree with the bipartisan bill the Senate had passed to preserve the tax cut for two months so Congress would have more time to work on a full-year extension.
Democrats, meantime, were happy to accuse Republicans of voting to block a tax cut and leaving town without finishing their work _ the same argument Republicans planned to use on them.
"The issue right now is this: The clock is ticking; time is running out," President Barack Obama said in a statement at the White House after the vote. "And if the House Republicans refuse to vote for the Senate bill, or even allow it to come up for a vote, taxes will go up in 11 days."
This was not a fight that seasoned Republican lawmakers, most prominent among them House Speaker John A. Boehner of Ohio, would have chosen. They see no value in having Americans think Republicans are allowing a tax increase, a message the White House continues to broadcast daily. Senate Republicans calculated that it was better to agree to an imperfect compromise, one that extends the tax break a couple of months and buys more negotiating time, than to try to argue otherwise.
But as happened so many times this year, those voices were drowned out by hard-charging House conservatives and their newly arrived "tea party" partners, who pushed the GOP to instigate one last round of brinkmanship as the year ends. Boehner took up their cause, and is now withstanding grumbles from within his ranks and the arrows of Republican allies in the Senate who view this as a no-win battle.
The difference between this stalemate and the many others that have defined the year in Washington is the role of Democrats, who have played defense in the year's bruising budget battles, including last summer's fight over raising the debt ceiling. This time, Obama and his fellow Democrats believe the public is on their side, and have expressed no interest in reviving talks they predict would yield little gain.
Finding compromise on a full-year deal would require consensus on the same tax and spending debates that have jammed budget talks all year. Democrats will not agree to steep cuts the GOP has demanded to pay the $200 billion costs of a yearlong tax cut package that both parties say they want. Unlike past tax deals, the GOP insists this one be paid for _ a position Democrats now share.
Because Republicans refused to consider Obama's proposal to cover the costs by imposing a surtax on those earning more than $1 million annually, Democrats see the GOP in the uncomfortable position of blocking a tax increase on the affluent while allowing one on 160 million American workers. If the tax benefit lapses, they calculate that Republicans will get the blame.
"I saw today that one of the House Republicans referred to what they're doing as 'high-stakes poker,'" said Obama, who appeared at the daily White House briefing. "He's right about the stakes, but this is not poker, this is not a game _ this shouldn't be politics as usual."
(EDITORS: BEGIN OPTIONAL TRIM)
Obama, whose family is in Hawaii for the holidays, delayed joining them by another day, with aides saying he held out hope that House Republicans would reconsider the Senate measure.
Boehner also tried to use his megaphone. At a news conference with members lined up on a riser like a church choir, the speaker urged Obama to call the Senate back into session.
"Now, it's up to the president to show real leadership," Boehner said. At one point, the lawmakers cheered.
(END OPTIONAL TRIM)
Republicans believe they are fighting the good fight. They say they prefer the traditional process of merging differing House- and Senate-passed bills into one.
The Founding Fathers might have appreciated the GOP's effort to stick to the constitutional rules, but it is unclear that the public will find it compelling. Democrats are readying campaign lines of attack and using the stalemate to raise campaign funds.
The GOP appointed eight negotiators to work over the holidays in hopes that the Senate would return to the bargaining table. Some other House members planned to remain in Washington as a show of support, even as most of their colleagues defended decisions to head home for the holidays.
"I don't think the public insists we sit around here fiddling our thumbs," said Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, who was planning to fulfill his Christmas wish of gathering his five grandchildren at home.
But with senators long gone, Democrats showed no signs of budging. House Republicans, too, remained adamant.
"Democrats need to be careful _ the president seems to be going on a scorched-earth policy," said Rep. Jack Kingston, R-Ga. "But if they think there's not going to be collateral damage on their side, they're out of their minds."
After seeing the difficulty this Congress has had finding compromise and wanting a break from a year of fierce partisan battles, GOP senators thought it best to approve the stopgap measure for now.
"I'm not going to argue with the House of Representatives, but do they want taxes to go up on January the 1st, or don't they?" said Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, who voted for the compromise, in a radio interview Tuesday. "If they don't do anything, the chances are taxes would go up."
That is a gamble both sides appear increasingly willing to take.

How state lawmakers voted

The 229-193 roll call Tuesday by which the House rejected legislation to extend a payroll tax cut and jobless benefits for two months.

A "yes" vote is a vote to reject the bill.

Voting yes were 0 Democrats and 229 Republicans.

Voting no were 186 Democrats and 7 Republicans.

WASHINGTON:

Democrats Dicks, N; Inslee, N; Larsen, N; McDermott, N; Smith, N.

Republicans Hastings, Y; Herrera Beutler, N; McMorris Rodgers, Y; Reichert, Y.

Story tags » UnemploymentPresidentHouseSenateUnemploymentMedicareTaxes

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus
digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.

loading...
HeraldNet Classifieds