Why the railroad doesn't have to listen to the city
Many questions I received sounded like this one sent by email from Judy Oberg of Everett:
"Last spring, 2011, the railroad, as part of 'slide mitigation,' cut down numerous trees on the bank in front of our home and others. No permission from homeowners was asked, and the trees were wacked down very low to the ground (as opposed to the topping-for-view style of cutting that many residents have traditionally used). We could hear the chainsaws going for several days, and I was appalled.
"How come the railroad can cut trees willy-nilly to prevent slides, and the city says trees must be left alone to prevent slides? These policies contradict each other."
She's talking about Burlington Northern Santa Fe clearing the railroad's right of way along W. Marine View Drive, just north of 10th Street. I plan to ask about the apparent contradiction in the science -- that baffles me too. As for the railroad's ability to cut trees without a permit, Everett's planning director said this a few weeks ago at a public meeting: "We can't do anything about that. They are the railroad."
The railroad is protected by decades-old federal laws designed to promote interstate commerce. And that, apparently, is that.
Most recent Inside Everett posts
Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.