The Herald of Everett, Washington
Customer service  |  Subscribe   |   Log in or sign up   |   Advertising information   |   Contact us
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up  Green editions icon Green editions
Dan Catchpole | dcatchpole@heraldnet.com
Published: Friday, October 19, 2012, 12:01 a.m.

SPEEA, Boeing and not-so-veiled threats

Last year's brouhaha involving Boeing, the Machinists and a National Labor Relations Board complaint over the company's South Carolina facility has made Boeing and labor leaders alike hyper-vigilant about how their rhetoric comes across.

Take this year's contract talks between Boeing and the Society of Professional Engineering Employees in Aerospace, for example.

Negotiators for both sides level implied threats, but neither wants to be straightforward about them for fear they'll end up in trouble with the NLRB.

Our Thursday story about SPEEA paving the way for an NLRB-protected strike gave union leaders trouble.

The trouble lay in the last sentence (bold is for emphasis): "SPEEA could try another tactic, a concerted work slowdown, instead of a strike, Dugovich said."

To be clear, SPEEA communications director Bill Dugovich used the phrase “work-to-rule” to describe the tactic, not "work slowdown." But a “work-to-rule” campaign involves union workers completing tasks by the book, which ideally means it takes longer to do the same work because, for example, they refuse voluntary overtime. So what is a “work-to-rule” campaign? A work slowdown.

SPEEA leaders are also being careful not to explicitly threaten a strike. In their latest update to members, about talks Thursday, the union said: "Using every available strategy, our negotiating teams are confident we will achieve your goals in these negotiations."

One such strategy was having members overwhelmingly vote down a Boeing contract offer. Asking members to give negotiators the power to call a strike, a logical next step, is another tactic the union has called “an important leverage point.” And SPEEA has employed a work slowdown -- OK, “work-to-rule” -- elsewhere, as it did at a Boeing plant in Kansas.

Boeing leaders are just as touchy about how thinly veiled threats are characterized.

Mike Delaney, vice president of engineering for Boeing Commercial Airplanes, has repeatedly implied that engineering work in the Puget Sound region is at stake in these negotiations -- that such work could be done elsewhere at less cost. Boeing's P.R. machine has been aggressive in challenging any news story, including some of ours, that quotes executives as having said the company will move work out of the region if the SPEEA contract is too costly, making clear that the official stance, regardless of what was said in an interview, is that Boeing merely could do so.

Like the difference between a work slowdown and "work-to-rule," that's a distinction only a lawyer could perceive.

Subscribe to Weekly business headlines
See sample | Privacy policy

Most recent Aerospace blog posts

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus
digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.

loading...
» More business


HeraldNet Classifieds