HeraldNet Ticket Giveaway

Fill out my online form.
The Herald of Everett, Washington
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up | Manage  Green editions icon Green editions


Splash! Summer guide

HeraldNet Headlines
HeraldNet Newsletter Delivered to your inbox each week.
Published: Sunday, March 3, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
In Our View: State Supreme Court's two-thirds' tax decision

A wise, unpopular decision

Much to the chagrin of a majority of Washington voters, the state Supreme Court on Thursday put the kibosh on the requirement of a two-thirds' majority vote of the Legislature to goose taxes. As The Herald Editorial Board opined last fall, the popular measure was clearly at variance with the Washington Constitution. If Washingtonians want to impose a have-it-stick supermajority requirement, we argued, we will need a constitutional amendment. It was a sentiment echoed by Justice Susan Owens who wrote the court's 6-3 majority opinion.
"Our holding today is not a judgment on the wisdom of requiring a supermajority for the passage of tax legislation. Such judgment is left to the legislative branch of our government," Owens wrote. "Should the people and the Legislature still wish to require a supermajority vote for tax legislation, they must do so through constitutional amendment, not through legislation."
One of the plaintiffs, Everett Rep. Mike Sells, makes a critical point that the supermajority requirement also extends to special interest and big business exemptions that bleed billions from the state. It takes a simple majority to finagle a tax loophole, but a supermajority to unsnaggle it. "Closing a tax exemption could be effectively blocked by 17 State Senators, while we have 147 members of both the House and Senate," Sells said. "That truly was, as the court put it, 'a tyranny of the minority.'"
The two-thirds' rule sounded like an effective stick to batter lawmakers into not raising taxes. Instead, it became a case study in unintended consequences, of corporations preserving their loopholes while lawmakers gave state universities the OK to hike tuition. In the long view of history, the requirement is inconsistent with how representative government is designed to work.
"On the larger question of democracy, it affirms the principle of one person one vote," said Rep. Hans Dunshee. "The U.S. Senate, with filibuster rules, and other governments have proven that supermajority rules harm a people's ability to govern themselves."
No one expects the Legislature to go slap happy on taxes, especially with a Republican-majority Senate and a governor who made a read-my-lips revenue pledge. The decision does open the door to poring over hundreds of lobbyist-maneuvered tax loopholes that have life everlasting. In light of anemic revenues and the state Supreme Court's McCleary decision mandating additional resources for K-12, lawmakers should revisit the 640 tax giveaways that already exist. That was the mission of a bipartisan proposal last year co-sponsored by Rep. Reuven Carlyle, a Democrat, and Glenn Anderson, a Republican, It makes sound fiscal sense to review and set expiration dates on hundreds of loopholes -- many that should continue, many that should be pitched.
If there's chatter about revenue, it should focus on exemptions. Meanwhile, lawmakers need to tackle the big kahuna, the state's paramount duty, fully funding K-12 education.

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus
digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.

Herald Editorial Board

Peter Jackson, Opinion Editor: pjackson@heraldnet.com (@PeterJHerald)

Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer: cmacpherson@heraldnet.com

Neal Pattison, Executive Editor: npattison@heraldnet.com

Jon Bauer, News Editor/Content Development: jbauer@heraldnet.com

Josh O'Connor, Publisher: joconnor@heraldnet.com

Have your say

Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. Send letters by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We'll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson at cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472.

HeraldNet highlights

Starting nine
Starting nine: Tasting beers under the sun at the Everett Craft Beer Fest
Looking for a friend?
Looking for a friend?: Animals up for adoption at the Everett shelter (new photos)
Change of focus
Change of focus: Photography gives retired deputy a new purpose
Growing pains
Growing pains: Lake Stevens makes plans to cope with rapid expansion