The Herald of Everett, Washington
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up | Manage  Green editions icon Green editions

Calendar


HeraldNet Headlines
HeraldNet Newsletter Delivered to your inbox each week.
Published: Thursday, May 9, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

Monroe puts end to red-light camera contracts

MONROE -- The city's nearly finished with traffic-enforcement cameras.
It's in writing now.
Monroe Mayor Robert Zimmerman on April 8 sent the city's camera vendor, Arizona-based Redflex Traffic Systems, a letter saying the city won't renew its contract when it expires later this year.
The Herald on Wednesday obtained the two-page letter under state public records laws.
As of Wednesday, the city had not received a response from Redflex, City Administrator Gene Brazel said.
City leaders aren't sure when the camera equipment will be removed from Monroe, Brazel said.
Much of the termination process is governed by the contract. It is unclear regarding an exact date.
The mayor's letter doesn't clarify the timeline.
"The City looks forward to Redflex's continued service throughout the remainder of the Initial Term and its cooperation in removing the company's Equipment at the conclusion of that term in accordance with the agreement," Zimmerman wrote.
Monroe's been dogged with controversy ever since the cameras went live in 2011. The opposition was spearheaded by Mukilteo-based activist Tim Eyman, who led a legal battle to remove the cameras.
Monroe voters repeatedly made clear in advisory elections that they wanted the cameras out of town. However, questions arose over how binding those votes are and whether the city had used litigation to thwart public participation.
The state Court of Appeals in February ruled in Monroe's favor in the court case that lasted roughly two years.
Eyman on Wednesday said he remains convinced the city would have kept the cameras indefinitely if it hadn't been for the court case and related disagreements.
He and other anti-camera activists are proud to have played a role in dismantling Monroe's camera program, which they considered a "money grab," he said Wednesday.
In Snohomish County, only Lynnwood and Monroe use traffic-enforcement cameras to ticket people who allegedly run red lights or speed in school zones.
Lynnwood's contract is in effect until fall 2016.
Rikki King: 425-339-3449; rking@heraldnet.com
Story tags » MonroePolicePoliticsRoads

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus
digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.