The Herald of Everett, Washington
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up | Manage  Green editions icon Green editions

Calendar

Splash! Summer guide

HeraldNet Headlines
HeraldNet Newsletter Delivered to your inbox each week.
Published: Tuesday, December 3, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Federal budget


Commissaries not the place to cut

I was dismayed when I read Tom Philpott's Friday column, "Pentagon requests plan to close commissaries" in the United States. The first thing the Pentagon, Congress and yes, the present administration think of is how we save by reducing the cost of providing a normal life for our veterans and current military members and their families.
I haven't heard any of the above say, "We could save millions by reducing the cost of our congressional members and their staffs. They have very long vacations and recesses, costing millions. Of course it's easy to say "How can we save?" and reply, "Oh, yes, there's the military commissaries, which cost $1.4 billion worldwide; there are 247 stores. Our active duty and retired members of the military use these stores and make their lives less stressful.
Don't they remember that military members and their families suffer when the military member is in combat or on long trips away from their families. Even death of some members occur.
I can remember during World War II, I saw my family for only about two months, during four deployments. I assume the same happens to present-day military members.
During the rest of my 20 years of service, I was gone on deployments while my wife and son were left alone. I sympathize with the present-day servicemen and women in Afghanistan as their enemy may be standing next to them. Everyone needs to remember the deployed member has expenses and their families have to pay rent, have transportation and have to feed their children in most cases.
I wish the Congress, Pentagon and administration could tell me and military persons why they think of the military first.
Just maybe, some of the non-essential members mentioned during the government shutdown should be reduced to help with the government budget.
Ernest Arnold
Everett
digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.

Herald Editorial Board

Peter Jackson, Opinion Editor: pjackson@heraldnet.com (@PeterJHerald)

Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer: cmacpherson@heraldnet.com

Neal Pattison, Executive Editor: npattison@heraldnet.com

Jon Bauer, News Editor/Content Development: jbauer@heraldnet.com

Josh O'Connor, Publisher: joconnor@heraldnet.com

Have your say

Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. Send letters by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We'll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson at cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472.

HeraldNet highlights

Looking for a friend?
Looking for a friend?: Animals up for adoption at the Everett shelter (new photos)
Quietly radical 'Boyhood'
Quietly radical 'Boyhood': Unique film explores awkward years with grace
Scarlett gets serious
Scarlett gets serious: Johansson finds her stride in 'Lucy'
'What's next?'
'What's next?': 7 questions for the offense as Seahawks hit training camp