The Herald of Everett, Washington
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up | Manage  Green editions icon Green editions

Calendar


HeraldNet Headlines
HeraldNet Newsletter Delivered to your inbox each week.
Published: Friday, July 18, 2014, 12:01 a.m.
Politics


Facts needed to make argument

Most of us base our perceptions on our own experiences, just as the writer of the Sunday letter, “Where would we take our country?” Thus, he provided no sources or stats to support his contention that everything but the hunting and fishing was worse in the “many Republican-run states” where he has worked. It might be more instructive, though, to look at some actual data on this topic.
The 2013 Consumer News & Business Channel www.cnbc.com/id/100824779 “scored all 50 states on 51 measures of competitiveness developed with input from business groups including the National Association of Manufacturers and the Council on Competitiveness.” Their website describes the method used (ranking of metrics, weighted categories), with the weights being based on how frequently they are cited in state economic development marketing materials. Thus, the “study ranks the states based on the criteria they use to sell themselves.”
Of the top 10, 90 percent are/were governed by Republican governors and Republicans have or had complete control of the legislatures of eight of those states. The remaining state governed by a Republican governor had a split Legislature. Only one of the 10 states was governed in total by Democrats.
Of the top 20, 15 or 75 percent are/were governed by Republican governors and in 13 of those states, R's had complete control of the legislature. Of the five with Democrat governors, one has a Republican-controlled legislature. Only four of the 20 are governed in total by Democrats. (The key element is leadership and being able to work through issues to get results.)
CNBC's metrics were not the metrics used by the writer, but doesn't this seem more reliable than his anecdotal evidence? (I'm very interested to know how he determined there was “more ignorance.” Was that based on a survey of his associates and friends?)
Jeannette Sumpter
Bothell
digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.

loading...

Herald Editorial Board

Jon Bauer, Opinion Editor: jbauer@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer: cmacpherson@heraldnet.com

Neal Pattison, Executive Editor: npattison@heraldnet.com

Josh O'Connor, Publisher: joconnor@heraldnet.com

Have your say

Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. Send letters by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We'll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson at cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472.