U.S. must summon spirit of cooperation, leadership

Leaders from around the world are meeting this week at the United Nations Climate Summit in New York City. There, the United States has a chance to retake our place among the great nations of history. We have a chance to get our mojo back. But to do so, we must boldly assume international leadership in the fight against climate change in ways that we have not yet done. We must turn our attention, our passion, our technical prowess and our creative economy to solving the growing life-cycle cost of burning carbon.

We now need to summon the bipartisan spirit of cooperation that undergirded other great national historical successes, such as creating universal public education, winning World War II, and landing on the moon.

This year, we will see what bold, world “bi-partisan” action looks like; next year, in Paris, the world body will work on implementation.

Yet, with the U.S. public divided on climate, how might President Obama frame the U.S. position as he talks to the world?

Obama will refer to “the science.” And it is a given, at the U.N., that “science says” global warming and man-induced climate change is real. This may not work for many U.S. citizens.

“Science rules,” but perhaps what actually rules for most of us is a whole constellation of legacy beliefs, principle fears, and hopes that frames our understanding of climate. Obama has got his work cut out, speaking for the nation and both parties.

A case in point is close to home. Witness the controversy in our Everett area over The Herald article on the coal and oil train protest (Sept. 2, “Protest blocks train tracks.”) The article prompted 100-plus reader comments on both sides of the issue.

While the U.S. is politically divided and possibly stuck in the climate debate, the U.N. will note:

Much of the world has a high level of concern over global warming, enabling European countries, and — since 2013 — Americas’ countries: Guatemala, Honduras, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Colombia, Chile, Bolivia and Peru, pass or announce intent to legislate major new policies to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

The world’s six multilateral development banks, including the World Bank, plan to step up targeted lending to combat climate change.

The U.S. military, both active duty — like Admiral Samuel Locklear, and retired — such as Rear Admiral Len Hering, weigh in heavily on the need to reduce world instability as a result of threat-multiplier effects of changing climate.

The vast majority of scientists around the world find convincing evidence of man-induced climate change, and many urge prompt action based on an approximately 95 percent level of confidence in the science about what is happening.

Will we join other nations, world banks, scientists and an outspoken U.S. military to take action? How might the U.S. overcome our partisan divide?

Ideally, we will use free markets, rely less on government, and go easy on citizens of all incomes.

Everyone needs to face facts about the total cost of energy. The price we see at the fuel pump is nominal. Our marketplace requires suitable price signals about fuel and pollution cost. Both parties can support full disclosure about life-cycle energy cost to guide our consumption — renewable energy, included.

Taking the broader, world perspective, we may acknowledge what Americans, per capita, consume and emit as compared to other countries. With China’s low per-person carbon footprint and heavy investment in renewable energy, we may decide to stop using China as an excuse for not acting.

We’re looking for something “bold,” but politically palatable. Something conservative and progressive. Something that restores Adam Smith’s “wisdom of the marketplace” for energy. Hopefully, something, “big.”

I’ll suggest a gradually increasing national tax on the carbon content of fuels — something that is not quite a tax … more like a fee. The fee serves as an up-front price signal for full cost of energy. All revenue is given back annually to citizens as a dividend check, or to off-set existing taxes. Net tax increase is zero. Consumers seek to minimize household energy cost by shifting to clean, efficient technologies. Both parties can support fees returned to households and spending controlled by consumers, as proposed by Citizens Climate Lobby.

Let’s all check in on the world forum in New York this week to find out what the world suggests for “bipartisan” world solutions, solutions that can pass.

Lee James, a member of the Citizens Climate Lobby, wrote this on behalf of its Whidbey Island chapter.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, March 28

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Initiative promoter Tim Eyman takes a selfie photo before the start of a session of Thurston County Superior Court, Wednesday, Feb. 10, 2021, in Olympia, Wash. Eyman, who ran initiative campaigns across Washington for decades, will no longer be allowed to have any financial control over political committees, under a ruling from Superior Court Judge James Dixon Wednesday that blasted Eyman for using donor's contributions to line his own pocket. Eyman was also told to pay more than $2.5 million in penalties. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
Editorial: Initiative fee increase protects process, taxpayers

Bumped up to $156 from $5, the increase may discourage attempts to game the initiative process.

Protecting forests and prevent another landslide like Oso

Thank you for the powerful and heartbreaking article about the Oso landslide… Continue reading

Boeing’s downfall started when engineers demoted

Boeing used to be run by engineers who made money to build… Continue reading

Learn swimming safety to protect kids at beach, pool

Don’t forget to dive into water safety before hitting the pool or… Continue reading

Comment: Why shootings have decreased but gun deaths haven’t

High-capacity magazines and ‘Glock switches’ that allow automatic fire have increased lethality.

Washington state senators and representatives along with Governor Inslee and FTA Administrator Nuria Fernandez break ground at the Swift Orange Line on Tuesday, April 19, 2022 in Lynnwood, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Community Transit making most of Link’s arrival

The Lynnwood light rail station will allow the transit agency to improve routes and frequency of buses.

An image of Everett Mayor Cassie Franklin is reflected in a storefront window during the State of the City Address on Thursday, March 21, 2024, at thee Everett Mall in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: State of city address makes case for Everett’s future

Mayor Franklin outlines challenges and responses as the city approaches significant decisions.

FILE - The massive mudslide that killed 43 people in the community of Oso, Wash., is viewed from the air on March 24, 2014. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: Mapping landslide risks honors those lost in Oso

Efforts continue in the state to map areas prone to landslides and prevent losses of life and property.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, March 27

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Burke: ‘Why not write about Biden, for once?’ Don’t mind if I do.

They asked; I’ll oblige. Let’s consider what the president has accomplished since the 2020 election.

Comment: Catherine missed chance to dispel shame of cancer

She wasn’t obligated to do so, but she might have used her diagnosis to educate a sympathetic public.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.