Obama OKs continued ‘combat operations’ in Afghanistan

WASHINGTON — The United States will remain in an armed conflict in Afghanistan — essentially at war — after the end of this year under rules for combat operations the Pentagon requested, and President Barack Obama approved, early this month.

Senior administration officials said that Obama agreed that U.S. military leaders in Afghanistan are authorized to approve combat operations, using ground forces, manned aircraft and drones, under three sets of circumstances.

They include counterterrorism operations against al-Qaida and other “transnational” terrorist groups, protection of U.S. forces engaged in training or other activities, and assistance to Afghan forces. Under those circumstances, U.S. forces likely will be engaged in direct combat with the Taliban and other groups that pose a threat to them or other members of the remaining international military coalition.

“Our expectation is that the Taliban and al-Qaida will continue to directly threaten U.S. and other forces in Afghanistan,” said a senior administration official who was permitted to discuss the issue only on condition of anonymity.

The new authorizations appeared to be a shift away from Obama’s statement, made in May, that “America’s combat mission will be over by the end of this year. Starting next year, Afghans will be fully responsible for securing their country.”

Obama ordered a reduction in the number of U.S. troops to 9,800 by January 1, and said their mission would be limited to training and advising Afghan forces, and to counterterrorism against al-Qaida. By the end of 2016, that number is to be reduced to about 1,000 U.S. military personnel attached to the U.S. Embassy in Kabul.

In explaining the newly-approved rules, which have been sent to the Pentagon to be turned into formal orders, the senior official drew a distinction between America’s “combat mission” in Afghanistan, and necessary guidelines for “combat operations” that will continue in specific situations.

Several months of discussions about the authorities, which were first reported by The New York Times, culminated with a meeting in late October in which Obama and his senior national security team listened to and questioned Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Gen. John Campbell, who commands U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan.

While some civilian officials objected to the scope of the Pentagon requests, Obama’s decision, made less than a week later, “essentially allows for an expanded set of counterterrorism authorities than what had previously envisioned_essentially giving the military status quo,” said another U.S. official.

A senior military official said the authorities were “not a license for offensive combat operations against the Taliban just because we still have U.S. capabilities in the country.” Officials said that a combat-capability was already built into planning for the 9,800 troops, and that the new authorities would not require additional resources.

International law uses the term “armed conflict” to refer to war. A determination that the war was over would require a different legal justification for combat operations than the one the administration has used since 2009 (as did its predecessor under former president George W. Bush).

With the new authorities, the senior administration official said, “as a matter of international law, we will remain in an armed conflict with al-Qaida and the Taliban.” He said the same circumstances for authorizing combat_force protection, counterterrorism, and assistance to Afghan forces_would also to apply to U.S. combat operations against Taliban subgroups, such as the Haqqani network, which are designated terrorists or pose a specific threat.

The official described debates within the administration as “a process in a legal way of defining the criteria and the threshholds for the use of those combat capabilities that would remain in theater, should they be needed. Going from combat to a non-combat mission doesn’t mean you go from full aperture to zero,” the official said.

“It was about a legal set of defining authorities, not about changing the mission, not about broadening the scope,” he said.

The official said the administration would also continue to use the Authorization for the Use of Military Force passed by Congress in 2001 to provide domestic legal justification for combat operations next year in Afghanistan. Obama said last year he wanted to “narrow” or repeal that authorization, since “the Afghan war is coming to an end.”

The definition of a threat justifying the use of U.S. combat forces is not spelled out in the new authorities, and is left largely to the discretion of commanders on the ground. “These authorities would reside at a fairly senior level of the military leadership,” the official said.

“I can’t give you an exact threshold” for use of the new rules, the official said. “That’s not how the authority is defined. It is limited; it’s not any circumstance.”

The official said that authorization for combat in counterterrorism operations against al-Qaida remnants and associated groups that remain in Afghanistan was not news, and “has always been integrated into our plan.”

While Afghan forces hold primary responsibility for protecting themselves and coalition forces, a combat capability was deemed necessary to protect U.S. and coalition troops that came under attack or were threatened, again at the discretion of commanders. Military officials had asked to have those authorities specified to ensure that available resources were not withheld when needed.

“One of the things we’ve made clear in these authorities,” the senior administration official said, was that “we will do what we need to do using what we consider combat capabilities as a force protection matter as the need requires.”

The military also asked the president to determine “in cases where the Afghans were truly on their own and needed some assistance, what would be the authority to use our combat role to assist them?” the official said.

“It’s limited, there has to be a threshold… It’s not a single checkpoint getting fired at,” and would depend on a commander’s determination of the availability of U.S. resources.

Ronald Neumann, a former U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan said that “it would have been intolerable for the American commander…to keep his aircraft on the ground while an Afghan unit was overrun because he was not authorized to use it.”

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Local News

A firefighter stands in silence before a panel bearing the names of L. John Regelbrugge and Kris Regelbrugge during the ten-year remembrance of the Oso landslide on Friday, March 22, 2024, at the Oso Landslide Memorial in Oso, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
‘Flood of emotions’ as Oso Landslide Memorial opens on 10th anniversary

Friends, family and first responders held a moment of silence at 10:37 a.m. at the new 2-acre memorial off Highway 530.

Julie Petersen poses for a photo with images of her sister Christina Jefferds and Jefferds’ grand daughter Sanoah Violet Huestis next to a memorial for Sanoah at her home on March 20, 2024 in Arlington, Washington. Peterson wears her sister’s favorite color and one of her bangles. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
‘It just all came down’: An oral history of the Oso mudslide

Ten years later, The Daily Herald spoke with dozens of people — first responders, family, survivors — touched by the deadliest slide in U.S. history.

Victims of the Oso mudslide on March 22, 2014. (Courtesy photos)
Remembering the 43 lives lost in the Oso mudslide

The slide wiped out a neighborhood along Highway 530 in 2014. “Even though you feel like you’re alone in your grief, you’re really not.”

Director Lucia Schmit, right, and Deputy Director Dara Salmon inside the Snohomish County Department of Emergency Management on Friday, March 8, 2024, in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
How Oso slide changed local emergency response ‘on virtually every level’

“In a decade, we have just really, really advanced,” through hard-earned lessons applied to the pandemic, floods and opioids.

Ron and Gail Thompson at their home on Monday, March 4, 2024 in Oso, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
In shadow of scarred Oso hillside, mudslide’s wounds still feel fresh

Locals reflected on living with grief and finding meaning in the wake of a catastrophe “nothing like you can ever imagine” in 2014.

Starbucks employee Zach Gabelein outside of the Mill Creek location where he works on Friday, Feb. 23, 2024 in Mill Creek, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Mill Creek Starbucks votes 21-1 to form union

“We obviously are kind of on the high of that win,” store bargaining delegate Zach Gabelein said.

Lynnwood police respond to a collision on highway 99 at 176 street SW. (Photo provided by Lynnwood Police)
Southbound lanes on Highway 99 reopen after crash

The crash, on Highway 99 at 176th Street SW, blocked traffic for over an hour. Traffic was diverted to 168th Street SW.

The view of Mountain Loop Mine out the window of a second floor classroom at Fairmount Elementary on Wednesday, Jan. 10, 2024 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
County: Everett mining yard violated order to halt work next to school

At least 10 reports accused OMA Construction of violating a stop-work order next to Fairmount Elementary. A judge will hear the case.

Imagine Children's Museum's incoming CEO, Elizabeth "Elee" Wood. (Photo provided by Imagine Children's Museum)
Imagine Children’s Museum in Everett to welcome new CEO

Nancy Johnson, who has led Imagine Children’s Museum in Everett for 25 years, will retire in June.

Kelli Littlejohn, who was 11 when her older sister Melissa Lee was murdered, speaks to a group of investigators and deputies to thank them for bringing closure to her family after over 30 years on Thursday, March 28, 2024, at Snohomish County Superior Court in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
‘She can rest in peace’: Jury convicts Bothell man in 1993 killing

Even after police arrested Alan Dean in 2020, it was unclear if he would stand trial. He was convicted Thursday in the murder of Melissa Lee, 15.

Ariel Garcia, 4, was last seen Wednesday morning in an apartment in the 4800 block of Vesper Dr. (Photo provided by Everett Police)
Search underway to find missing Everett child, 4

Ariel Garcia was last seen Wednesday morning at an apartment in the 4800 block of Vesper Drive.

The rezoned property, seen here from the Hillside Vista luxury development, is surrounded on two sides by modern neighborhoods Monday, March 25, 2024, in Lake Stevens, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Despite petition, Lake Stevens OKs rezone for new 96-home development

The change faced resistance from some residents, who worried about the effects of more density in the neighborhood.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.