Nursing homes’ low staffing levels raise concerns for care

As a certified nursing assistant at an Edmonds long-term care facility where staffing levels have fallen short for as long as I can remember, I support the Quality Care Act, legislation that would require nursing homes to provide enough caregivers to take care of our most vulnerable citizens.

Many people are shocked when they hear that there are no regulations at all in Washington governing how many people a nursing home worker can be assigned to care for. Our residents are elderly, disabled and often have mental or memory problems. Many require multiple staff to get them in and out of bed. Not surprisingly, lower resident-to-staff ratios are directly linked to lower resident mortality rates, lower hospitalization rates and improved mental and physical condition.

My co-workers and I take pride in giving vulnerable people quality care. But all too often, our employer does not, cutting staffing levels so ruthlessly that our residents suffer.

It’s common for an aide on day shift to be responsible for 15 or more residents at a time. We all know that it is simply impossible to provide quality care, including getting residents up, changing them, feeding them, grooming them and helping them with safety and basic hygiene, with so few staff on duty.

Our vulnerable residents get bed sores, sit around in wet or soiled garments and sustain sometimes life-threatening falls because of short-staffing.

The worst staffing I have ever seen there was about two years ago, when only two aides were scheduled to take care of 62 residents. That is a seriously dangerous staffing level. Many of us had to lift residents who ordinarily required two staffers to lift them. On this particular day, I sustained a shoulder injury trying to lift a patient.

The Quality Care Act, HB 1784, would help improve our working conditions while improving the lives of some of Washington’s most vulnerable residents by making three critical changes to state law governing conditions at Washington State nursing homes.

First, it would set mandatory minimum staffing levels for all nursing-homes: Seven residents per nursing assistant during the day, nine during evening hours, and 16 per aide overnight.

Second, it would ensure sure that a registered nurse is on staff at all nursing homes, 24 hours a day; currently, Washington requires only that one RN be on site for 16 hours a day, leaving facilities without any licensed medical staff for up to eight hours daily.

Finally, it would promote quality care by basing the rates paid to nursing homes on how well they meet quality standards, including resident and family satisfaction, worker injuries and turnover rates, and resident health.

We are the people who are there every day, making sure that your parents and grandparents are taken care of. We stay in this job because we want to make a difference in people’s lives. But we need adequate staffing to help ensure that your loved ones are healthy, safe, and happy in our facilities. That’s a goal we share with families and residents, and one that minimum staffing levels would do much to accomplish.

Sylvia Brown is a certified nursing assistant at a long-term care facility in Edmonds. She lives in Everett.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, May 8

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks to reporters during a press conference about the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Wednesday, May 1, 2024. Senate Democrats reintroduced broad legislation on Wednesday to legalize cannabis on the federal level, a major shift in policy that has wide public support, but which is unlikely to be enacted this year ahead of November’s elections and in a divided government. (Valerie Plesch/The New York Times)
Editorial: Federal moves on cannabis encouraging, if incomplete

The Biden administration and the Senate offer sensible proposals to better address marijuana use.

Tom Burke: Don’t know much about history? Better start reading

Reading — anything — matters, but especially before an election with history-making consequences.

Where did Carolyn Hax advice column go?

Recently the Herald has replaced the Carolyn Hax column with Dear Abby.… Continue reading

Why did The Herald add an astrology column in print?

We live in times when accurate information and good science are vital.… Continue reading

Plastics are vital to health care

Regarding a recent letter warning about plastic pollution: For the past six… Continue reading

Climate change, nuclear war threat to life on earth

There is one sentinel topic that has received minimal media attention in… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, May 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A radiation warning sign along the road near the Hanford Site in Washington state, on Aug. 10, 2022. Hanford, the largest and most contaminated of all American nuclear weapons production sites, is too polluted to ever be returned to public use. Cleanup efforts are now at an inflection point.  (Mason Trinca/The New York Times)
Editorial: Latest Hanford cleanup plan must be scrutinized

A new plan for treating radioactive wastes offers a quicker path, but some groups have questions.

Maureen Dowd: Consider the three faces of Donald Trump

Past, present and future are visibile in his countenance; an especially grim one on the cover of Time.

Paul Krugman: Still no stag and not much flation

The grumbling about inflation’s slow path to 2 percent isn’t worth steps that risk a recession.

David Brooks: Why past is prologue and protests help Trump

Today’s crowd-sourced protests muddle their message and goals and alienate the quiet disapprovers.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.