No, Mr. Shatner, California can’t have our water

Next to using the Starship Enterprise to beam an iceberg to California, “Star Trek” actor and Priceline spokesman William Shatner’s proposal to crowdsource $30 billion to build a water pipeline along I-5 from Washington to California is just a tad less loopy.

Even loopier is Shatner’s assumption that such a pipeline would be doing us a favor because “there’s too much water” in Seattle, as he told Yahoo! Tech’s David Pogue.

History is not on Shatner’s side. His idea was actually proposed 50 years ago, as SeattlePI.com’s Joel Connelly wrote Tuesday. Federal and California officials proposed channeling water from the Columbia River or other Northwest rivers to the Golden State, until Everett’s Sen. Henry M. “Scoop” Jackson threw cold water on the plan by inserting a rider into legislation that would have required any feasibility studies sought by the federal Bureau of Reclamation to have the approval of Congress before advancing.

But credit Shatner with at least raising the issue.

California, without question, is suffering under one its most severe droughts on record. But the same weather system, a “ridiculously resilient” ridge of high pressure, that has significantly contributed to drought in the Southwest U.S. has also brought record low snowpacks this winter to Washington state. A report by the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service found that statewide snowpack is only 22 percent of normal, much lower than the previous record in 2005 of 33 percent of normal. A spokesman for the service said 74 percent of its snow-monitoring sites reported record snowpack lows.

California Gov. Jerry Brown has instituted mandatory water-saving measures there. And Washington will have to take its own steps to confront the lower flow we will likely see in state rivers this year. Gov. Jay Inslee has reconvened the state’s committee on drought and water supply and has declared a drought emergency for 24 river basins, including the Stillaguamish and Skagit rivers in Snohomish County. A full supply of water is expected for those with senior water rights in the state, but those with junior water rights may have only a 54 percent supply.

Northwest meteorologist Cliff Mass has said he doesn’t believe this winter’s record low snowpack is a result of human-caused climate change. But Mass has said that the Northwest can expect more winters like this with similar precipitation but less snow as climate change advances in the decades to come.

Grand schemes are unlikely to solve our water woes. Each state, down to each watershed, will have to find ways to live within its means in terms of water. California, for starters, can seek to stop Nestle from bottling water from springs, using permits that expired more than 20 years ago.

With apologies to the starship captain, Washington will need every drop of rain and every flake of snow as we seek to balance an increasingly precious resource among demands for agriculture, salmon, hydropower and what comes out of our taps.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, May 8

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks to reporters during a press conference about the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Wednesday, May 1, 2024. Senate Democrats reintroduced broad legislation on Wednesday to legalize cannabis on the federal level, a major shift in policy that has wide public support, but which is unlikely to be enacted this year ahead of November’s elections and in a divided government. (Valerie Plesch/The New York Times)
Editorial: Federal moves on cannabis encouraging, if incomplete

The Biden administration and the Senate offer sensible proposals to better address marijuana use.

Tom Burke: Don’t know much about history? Better start reading

Reading — anything — matters, but especially before an election with history-making consequences.

Where did Carolyn Hax advice column go?

Recently the Herald has replaced the Carolyn Hax column with Dear Abby.… Continue reading

Why did The Herald add an astrology column in print?

We live in times when accurate information and good science are vital.… Continue reading

Plastics are vital to health care

Regarding a recent letter warning about plastic pollution: For the past six… Continue reading

Climate change, nuclear war threat to life on earth

There is one sentinel topic that has received minimal media attention in… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, May 7

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A radiation warning sign along the road near the Hanford Site in Washington state, on Aug. 10, 2022. Hanford, the largest and most contaminated of all American nuclear weapons production sites, is too polluted to ever be returned to public use. Cleanup efforts are now at an inflection point.  (Mason Trinca/The New York Times)
Editorial: Latest Hanford cleanup plan must be scrutinized

A new plan for treating radioactive wastes offers a quicker path, but some groups have questions.

Maureen Dowd: Consider the three faces of Donald Trump

Past, present and future are visibile in his countenance; an especially grim one on the cover of Time.

Paul Krugman: Still no stag and not much flation

The grumbling about inflation’s slow path to 2 percent isn’t worth steps that risk a recession.

David Brooks: Why past is prologue and protests help Trump

Today’s crowd-sourced protests muddle their message and goals and alienate the quiet disapprovers.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.