Money’s influence in health care isn’t on patients’ side

The 2014 legislative session showed anew the power of money in health care.

Big-box stores sought to further displace audiologists’ small businesses by seeking greater authority for “hearing instrument fitters” who lack the extensive clinical, and diagnostic, training of audiologists with graduate degrees.

Grandiloquently renaming fitters “hearing aid specialists,” a House bill allowed work with no degrees and “work-based learning permits.” In an aging society where hearing loss is a growing problem, and given the importance of hearing to whole-body health and the great expense of hearing aids (often uncovered by insurance), consumers are hardly protected by allowing stores known for bargain-rate toilet paper to provide medical training.

Other big companies seeking to benefit included some selling “hearing aids” that are simply sound amplifiers, no more diagnostic than the ear trumpets featured, often to comical effect, in movies about bygone ages. And the mere 520 hours of “work-based” training allowing one to avoid direct supervision of this medical care would be less than the 600 hours state law requires of a manicurist, or the 1,000 hours for barbers.

One of the big-box beneficiaries gave $45,626 in state political contributions in 2012. A Senate amendment marginally improved the bill by requiring study of the “work-based learning” element.

This was not the only blow to health care consumers. Due to conservative histrionics about “single-payer health care,” the Affordable Care Act follows a commercial insurance model. Yet the ACA, in many states including Washington, has blessed with taxpayer dollars what, effectively, were already single-payer systems in the individual market.

According to recent data, 63.2 percent of health insurance bought through Washington’s Healthplanfinder — or “exchange” — came through Premera or Premera’s wholly owned subsidiary Lifewise. Put that in perspective: the next closest carrier was Group Health at just 17.7 percent. There are counties where Premera is your only option.

This effective monopoly will only be cemented, and expanded, by four-fifths of exchange enrollment being subsidized through federal tax dollars.

Yet Premera killed a bill to allow scrutiny of what it actually spends money on. The bill would have given consumers, including businesses, access to a basic statewide-price database — allowing them to compare prices for hospitals and other providers. So logical was this idea that those suing to overturn the ACA were among those lobbying in favor. And Premera’s fingerprints were not obscured on the knife: After a Senate committee chair did its bidding, Premera publicly thanked her.

Deservedly, this created bad publicity and editorial hand-wringing across the state.

However, it was nothing new. Killing examination of what it spends money on is only Premera’s most recent success; for years now, it has even killed examination of how much money it has. Premera opposes legislation to give the insurance commissioner authority to regulate the over $1 billion in surplus it has accumulated on the backs of consumers, contracting providers, and its own brokers.

Unlike regulators in other states that include neighboring Oregon, and even Arkansas, Washington’s commissioner — in examining premium increases — must, under the law, simply pretend the enormous cash cushions of “nonprofit” insurance carriers don’t exist.

Premera’s success may have something to do with the $290,400 it showered upon politicians of both parties in the last election cycle. Presumably, this amount will increase due to forced ACA enrollment. Thus all Washington citizens — whether they are Premera policyholders or simply taxpayers — will contribute toward Premera’s political investment strategy. What a national report by the union UNITE HERE labels “one of the largest transfers of public wealth to private hands ever” is certainly the biggest such transfer since the transcontinental railroads were beneficiaries in the Gilded Age.

Welcome to your new health care system!

Brendan Williams is a former member of the Washington Legislature.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

A model of a statue of Billy Frank Jr., the Nisqually tribal fishing rights activist, is on display in the lobby of the lieutenant governor's office in the state Capitol. (Jon Bauer / The Herald.
Editorial: Recognizing state history’s conflicts and common ground

State officials seek consensus in siting statues of an Indian rights activist and a missionary.

November 17, 2025: But Her Emails
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Nov. 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Where are cartoons lampooning Kamala Harris?

I agree with a recent letter writer, The Herald Opinion page’s cartoons… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons are satire; it’s to be expected

I have read and sent letters to the editor of The Herald… Continue reading

People should rely on own savings not on goverment assistance

Laudable is the social legislation that provides 26 weeks of subsidies to… Continue reading

Comment: What climate ‘realists’ miss are pledges’ quiet wins

Climate fatalists should consider that nations committed to reductions are meeting their targets.

Comment: Too many kids can’t read; blame lack of spelling tests

Leaving the task to spellcheck holds back kids’ skill and love of reading. Spelling is key to comprehension.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Nov. 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE — President Donald Trump and Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick display a chart detailing tariffs, at the White House in Washington, on Wednesday, April 2, 2025. The Justices will hear arguments on Wednesday, Nov. 5, 2025 over whether the president acted legally when he used a 1977 emergency statute to unilaterally impose tariffs.(Haiyun Jiang/The New York Times)
Editorial: Public opinion on Trump’s tariffs may matter most

The state’s trade interests need more than a Supreme Court ruling limiting Trump’s tariff power.

Comment: Ignoring Trump, stock market believes in climate crisis

Green energy and cleantech indices are outperforming the overall market. You can partially thanks AI’s demand.

Comment: Shutdown raises profile of childcare as an issue

With work requirements on or coming for SNAP and Medicaid, more families will rely on Head Start.

Saunders: Shutdown is over; recriminations for Democrats aren’t

Except for a handful of heroes, the Democrats need to explain why they put so many through this.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.