Getting the jobs we paid for

Quid pro quo.

The Latin term generally means “something for something.” In Washington state it often means “tax breaks for jobs.” At least that was what many thought it meant in late 2013 when the Legislature and the governor passed tax incentives worth about $8.7 billion over 16 years in exchange for Boeing’s promise to build the 777X and its wings in Everett and keep its jobs in the state.

Boeing, indeed, is building the 777X here, but the disappointment was sharply felt when only months later it announced it would move about 1,000 engineering jobs for other aircraft lines in Western Washington to California. In moving the jobs to California, Boeing said employees could apply for the work in that state or it would look to employ displaced workers elsewhere in the area but with no guarantees of employment.

The state, in offering the tax package, left a loophole that allowed Boeing to bring new jobs here with one hand while moving out existing jobs with the other.

Which brings us to the term “clawback,” which must be Latin for “payback.”

Legislators now are seeking to claw back some of the incentives to ensure the state sees a net gain in jobs from Boeing and other aerospace companies taking advantage of the tax incentives. State Rep. June Robinson, D-Everett, is expected to propose legislation this week that would scale back Boeing’s tax breaks if it trims employees here to move jobs elsewhere. A second bill, House Bill 1786, would require aerospace companies, many of them Boeing suppliers, to pay veteran employees a minimum of $53,000 a year — about $25 an hour — or lose their tax breaks.

Robinson’s bill, depending on the details, could be worth consideration, but the other bill may be sinking its claws in the wrong back. The intent of the tax incentives was to keep jobs in the state, not to set payroll policy for smaller aerospace companies.

In trading tax breaks for jobs, state officials should be able to identify the benefits the state is getting in return for incentives that, in the end, are subsidized by taxpayers. Fortunately, there’s a method for doing just that.

In October, the Citizens Commission for Performance Measurement of Tax Preferences, a five-member committee established by the Legislature in 2006 that reviews tax preferences, said the state needed a clear means of assessing what it was getting for its $8.7 billion. But in order to complete that work, the commission advised, the state needs to develop ways of measuring and tracking the jobs that the incentives are supposed to foster. As yet, that hasn’t been done. No doubt, such a study would require that some state agency, and perhaps the commission itself, be provided the resources to do that work.

Legislators can look at ways to make sure the state gets enough quid for its quo. And those negotiating for the state need to be specific about what they expect out of such deals before they have to claw back any tax breaks. But the state also has work ahead of it to establish methods to measure the costs and benefits of trading billions in taxpayer subsidies for jobs.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

October 23, 2025: No Kings Protest
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Oct. 26

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: A recap of Herald Editorial Board endorsements

By The Herald Editorial Board Voters, open up your ballots and voters… Continue reading

In an official White House photo, President Lyndon Johnson shakes hands with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. after signing the Voting Rights Act of 1965, in Washington on Aug. 6, 1965. The Supreme Court has shown a willingness to chip away at the landmark civil rights legislation. A Louisiana case could unravel much of its remaining power. (Yoichi Okamoto/Lyndon B. Johnson Library via The New York Times) — NO SALES. FOR EDITORIAL USE ONLY. —
Comment: Ruling could effectively end landmark voting rights act

If the Supreme Court throws out Section 2 of the act, Republicans could gain up to 19 more seats.

Herald endorsements: Editorial board’s opinions valued

Herald endorsements Editorial board’s opinions valued We’ve been Everett Herald subscribers for… Continue reading

Sale of waterfront park in Mukilteo needs more discussion

Mukilteo park Park’s sale needs more discussion The Mukilteo City Council voted… Continue reading

Everett School Board: Jackson Laurence well qualified

Everett School Board Jackson Laurence well qualified I’m writing to express my… Continue reading

Monroe mayor: Cudaback right person to lead

Monroe mayor Cudaback right person to lead Our family has known Patsy… Continue reading

Snohomish mayor: City blossoming with Redmon

Snohomish mayor City blossoming with Redmon I am writing to give strong… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Oct. 23

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

2024 Presidential Election Day Symbolic Elements.
Editorial: Elect Allison, Golebiewski to Mill Creek council

Allison merits a second term for Position 3. Golebiewski should be elected to Position 4’s open seat.

Monroe Mayor: Cudaback prepared for work

Monroe Mayor Cudaback prepared for work My choice for the next mayor… Continue reading

Everett School Board: Tom Clarke best for Pos. 3

Everett School Board Tom Clarke best for Pos. 3 One of the… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.