Stay focused on helpful ideas

When faced with a long list of tasks, the temptation is to start with the easiest to complete. Sometimes that can help build momentum toward taking on tougher tasks, but it can also divert attention and energy from the overall goal.

That appears to be what happened earlier this week when the Everett City Council planned to discuss three proposals linked to the city’s struggles with homelessness and addiction issues. The council was to discuss three ordinances at its Wednesday meeting, two of which were recommendations that came out of Everett’s Community Streets Initiative. The initiative, launched last year by Mayor Ray Stephanson, brought together representatives from businesses, social service groups, churches and law enforcement to develop strategies that would do more than treat the symptoms of homelessness and addiction in the Everett area and instead address the underlying causes.

The task force used consensus to develop a list of 63 recommendations, and work has begun to implement them. Some, like investigation of a housing levy, are longer-term goals. Others were seen as easier to implement.

But among those recommendations are those that some, including members of the Community Streets process, see as more punitive toward the homeless, reported Herald Writer Chris Winters earlier this week.

One proposed ordinance would establish an alcohol-impact area, barring the sale of certain cheap but high-alcohol beverages. Another would ban panhandling at intersections with a traffic signal and on median strips. A third proposed ordinance, one that wasn’t discussed or endorsed during the Community Streets process, would prohibit people from sitting or lying on sidewalks or camping or erecting tents on public rights of way. The last ordinance, drafted in response to a homeless encampment between the Everett Gospel Mission and Everett Station, was removed from the council’s agenda for Wednesday.

City leaders were correct to drop the third from consideration, at least for the time being; one reason being Community Streets members wanted more information about it. The City Council, of course, is free to consider any ordinance it chooses, but linking the one barring encampments to the other two threatened to muddle their fair consideration. It’s also doubtful a ban on sitting on sidewalks would endure a court challenge.

The pros and cons of the two remaining ordinances can be debated but, particularly for reasons of safety, the ordinance barring panhandling at street corners and on medians should receive the council’s consideration and without distractions.

There are scores of worthy strategies that need the larger community’s consideration and support in the coming weeks and months. Anything that would draw attention and energy away from them should be discouraged.

On a related note, it’s encouraging that a bill proposed by Rep. June Robinson, D-Everett, which allows ambulances to take those with mental health and substance abuse problems to crisis clinics or treatment centers rather than emergency rooms, has passed both House and Senate and is on its way to the governor’s desk. Previously only law enforcement officers were allowed to make that call.

As we’ve said earlier, efforts like these will allow Everett to address the causes of these problems rather than simply displace the people who are suffering with them.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, July 2

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) speaks during a news conference at the U.S. Capitol on Friday, June 27, 2025. The sweeping measure Senate Republican leaders hope to push through has many unpopular elements that they despise. But they face a political reckoning on taxes and the scorn of the president if they fail to pass it. (Kent Nishimura/The New York Times)
Editorial: GOP should heed all-caps message on tax policy bill

Trading cuts to Medicaid and more for tax cuts for the wealthy may have consequences for Republicans.

Burke: Assessing dangers to democracy, knowing how to respond

In judging a threat consider Trump’s intent and his ability to carry out his intentions.

Oppose passage of ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ in Congress

The so-called “Big Beautiful Bill” threatens half of America’s children. (“Medicaid cuts… Continue reading

Stand up to oppose cuts to Medicaid and more

I am a senior citizen, having believed for the years of my… Continue reading

Skip the private fireworks displays, please

As everyone knows, our great country’s birthday, The Fourth of July, is… Continue reading

Comment: ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ will be hard sell to public

Republicans now must explain its cuts to health coverage, SNAP and clean energy credits and additional debt.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, July 1

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Dowd: Trump obliterates any sense of reliance on facts, truth

Any attempt to set the record straight is met with charges of having a lack of respect and patriotism.

Saunders: Price to pay for GOP senators who defy the president

Trump wants his Bill Beautiful Bill passed; and soon. Republicans’ future may hinge on it.

Comment: GOP’s Big Beautiful Bill extreme on immigration, too

Currently, $18,000 is spent for every undocumented immigrant. The bill increases that five-fold.

Comment: Term limits in Congress would only make it weaker

Limiting terms would result in a younger Congress, but would transfer power to lobbyists and staffers.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.