Senate budget risks gains made for state lands

Nationally, over the last few years, we’ve witnessed an anti-public lands campaign take hold — from Cliven Bundy’s brazen standoff with the Bureau of Land Management to the more insidious creep of consistent underfunding for our national parks. However, it seemed absurd that that thinking would gain real traction here in Washington, where recognizing the importance of our public lands and holding them in trust for the next generation has long been a bipartisan value.

But this year, there’s something afoot in the state Legislature that’s putting the future of our public lands in danger. The Senate is pushing a moratorium on public land acquisition in their capital budget proposal.

In simple terms, the Senate is taking an ill-advised position that ignores the very real value of land acquisition — from an ecological, economic and long-term cost savings perspective.

Why does land acquisition matter?

Outdoor recreation is part of the Washington way of life. Access to public lands ensures that people across Washington state can fish, hike and kayak — and taking strategic advantage of available lands means that those opportunities will be available for everyone for years to come.

Strategic land acquisition is essential for salmon recovery: Acquisition is a necessary component of restoration. Finding key pieces of land that either pose the biggest threat to salmon recovery or hold the greatest potential, removing fish passage barriers, restoring natural conditions along key points of the river and connecting habitat is essential to the process. We can’t do restoration without first doing acquisition.

Land acquisition helps keep our state’s water clean by preventing pavement letting uncovered ground provide natural filtration that helps prevent the flow of polluted stormwater runoff. And public lands along streams, rivers and estuaries provide cool, clean water for fish and people.

Prevention is almost always more cost-effective than cleanup. That’s particularly true for Puget Sound. As a region we have struggled — and continue to struggle — to find restoration solutions. Land acquisition protects land in good condition before it is damaged, thus avoiding the higher cost of restoration.

As people who have devoted much of their working lives to protecting Puget Sound, we both know that Sound protection and restoration requires all the tools we have at our disposal. We must do more than hold the status quo; we can’t make serious progress with only restoration of public lands we currently own.

The Senate’s moratorium on land acquisition will have real world impacts, a prime example of which is loss of funding for the Busy Wild Creek Protection project, a $6.5 million project to purchase 1,920 acres of forestland for the Nisqually Community Forest.

The Busy Wild Creek Protection Project is a privately-managed acquisition project that protects salmon habitat and provides public recreational uses — including a popular no-fee hut-to-hut cross-country skiing trail. These types of dual benefits are what public land acquisition is all about.

We both hail from a Puget Sound perspective, but what’s happening in the Legislature is a problem that’s not unique to Puget Sound recovery. The Senate is applying the same approach to the well-regarded Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program by eliminating funding for otherwise highly ranked proposals to protect lands for habitat and recreation.

Washington voters value our state’s environmental health — rightly seeing it as inextricably linked with our economy and public health.

Our state budget serves as a blueprint for our values. The Senate’s proposal to eliminate funding for public lands stands in stark contrast to what we hold dear. Unfortunately, the state Senate seems determined to remove an important tool from our recovery toolbox. This short-sighted lens will put Washington’s water, wildlife, salmon and environmental health at risk.

David Troutt is the natural resource director for the Nisqually Indian Tribe, chairman of the state Salmon Recovery Funding Board and chairman of Puget Sound Salmon Recovery Council. Martha Kongsgaard is the chairwoman of the Puget Sound Partnership Leadership Council and a founder of the Kongsgaard-Goldman Foundation.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON - OCTOBER 10: A Seattle Sonics fan holds a sign before the Rain City Showcase in a preseason NBA game between the LA Clippers and the Utah Jazz at Climate Pledge Arena on October 10, 2023 in Seattle, Washington. (Photo by Steph Chambers/Getty Images)
Editorial: Seahawks’ win whets appetite for Sonics’ return

A Super Bowl win leaves sports fans hungering for more, especially the return of a storied NBA franchise.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Feb. 11

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Burke: Whistle while we work to preserve democracy

Prepare for the work of patriots with a whistle and a new ‘Manual for Keeping Democracy.’

Comment: Congress must place more controls on Insurrection Act

Calling on troops for law enforcement needs better guardrails than are now in place.

Comment: Severe winter storms aren’t refuting climate crisis

Global warming makes weather patterns more chaotic, leading to damaging winter storms as well as heat.

Trump: On immigration, Trump had right policy but still failed

His polling on the issue is underwater because of poor implementation and dismissive rhetoric.

Comment: No, tax refunds won’t fuel a ‘non-inflationary’ boom

Income tax cuts benefit high-earners the most. And most refunds will go to debt or savings.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Feb. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Don’t relax your vigilance of abuses by ICE, Trump administration

I have been afraid to write my opinion about what is happening… Continue reading

Congress must follow up on Epstein files

What do you hear of the Epstein files these days, folks? A… Continue reading

Comment: Trump shares this with many voters: his racism

Why did Trump think he could post a racist meme? Because too many Americans are OK with it.

Comment: Trump’s base is tiring of him at a bad time for GOP

Trump is losing support among white working-class voters, a bad sign as the midterms approach.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.