Chemical safety bill may have good shot

Most Americans believe the chemicals in products they buy in the supermarket have been tested for safety. But the scandalous truth is our main chemical safety law is so badly broken that no one has the authority to ensure the safety of chemicals used in everything from cleaning products to clothes to couches. Until we fix that, Washington state families will continue to be guinea pigs for every chemical on the market or will come on the market.

This is an issue every parent and every family should care about. Tens of thousands of chemicals are in products on the market today and science has increasingly tied some of them to cancer, infertility, diabetes, Parkinson’s and other illnesses.

For years Congress failed to fix this problem because they were unable to get the bipartisan support necessary to pass a bill. Public health advocates, including the Environmental defense fund, would lend our support to “ideal” legislation, only to see it blocked by allies of the chemical industry. And in the meantime, Americans were left exposed to these dangerous or untested chemicals.

Some states have worked hard to fill the void. But with few resources, they have been unable to make much of a dent. All told, only about a dozen chemicals or chemical groups have been restricted by states in the last four decades. In Washington state, only nine chemicals face state restrictions, and those only for limited uses.

But recently, something remarkable has happened. In a Congress known for gridlock, a bipartisan group of senators developed legislation that actually fixes the biggest problems in the current system — and has a real chance of becoming law. The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act — named after the late anti-tobacco crusader who wrote the original version — has 41 co-sponsors in the Senate, evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans. Washington state’s Sens. Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray are closely following the issue, as well. It is the kind of bipartisan momentum rarely seen on any issue in Washington.

This bill is not only bipartisan; it’s solid. The bill would:

Require a safety review for all chemicals in use today.

Ensure all new chemicals pass a safety check before they can be sold.

Explicitly require protection for those most at risk from toxic chemicals, such as children and pregnant women.

Give the EPA new authority to require companies to test chemicals for safety.

Increase the availability of health information on chemicals in use to states, first responders and the general public.

The broad support for these tough new requirements didn’t just happen. The chemical industry finally realized that the lack of a strong system to give consumers confidence in their products was hurting their business. They also prefer a national system to a state-by-state patchwork. So to get that, they’ve made significant concessions to public health and environmental advocates. The bill represents a compromise, but one that is vastly better than current law and finally breaks decades of failed attempts at reform.

What is clearly unacceptable is to stay with the status quo. Under the current system all Americans are losing. Its failures represent a serious and growing public health calamity. American families cannot afford to watch Congress squander the best opportunity ever to improve protections from toxic chemicals. Congress needs to pass this legislation now.

Richard Denison is a lead senior scientist in the Environmental Defense Fund’s Health Program.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

County Council members Jared Mead, left, and Nate Nehring speak to students on Thursday, Jan. 30, 2025, during Civic Education Day at the Snohomish County Campus in Everett, Washington. (Will Geschke / The Herald)
Editorial: Students get a life lesson in building bridges

Two county officials’ civics campaign is showing the possibilities of discourse and government.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, April 28

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Musk doesn’t understand what Lincoln knew

That government should do the things that individuals and markets can’t or won’t do. That’s not waste, fraud or abuse.

Brooks: Trump’s greatest strength can also be his downfall

Trump has succeeded in his first 100 days by moving fast and breaking things. That serves his opposition.

Harrop: How can Elon Musk be a genius yet so clueless?

Now that President Trump has what he needs from him, Musk is being discarded, and poorer for it.

Comment: Stifling climate anxiety only ignores the problem

If we want kids to be less anxious about climate change, educate them and show them there are solutions.

FILE - This Feb. 6, 2015, file photo, shows a measles, mumps and rubella vaccine on a countertop at a pediatrics clinic in Greenbrae, Calif. Washington state lawmakers voted Tuesday, April 23, 2019 to remove parents' ability to claim a personal or philosophical exemption from vaccinating their children for measles, although medical and religious exemptions will remain. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg, File)
Editorial: Commonsense best shot at avoiding measles epidemic

Without vaccination, misinformation, hesitancy and disease could combine for a deadly epidemic.

Local artist Gabrielle Abbott with her mural "Grateful Steward" at South Lynnwood Park on Wednesday, April 21, 2021 in Lynnwood, Wash. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Earth Day calls for trust in act of planting trees

Even amid others’ actions to claw back past work and progress, there’s hope to fight climate change.

Snohomish County Elections employees check signatures on ballots on Tuesday, Oct. 29, 2024 in Everett , Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Trump order, SAVE Act do not serve voters

Trump’s and Congress’ meddling in election law will disenfranchise voters and complicate elections.

(NYT1) VATICAN CITY, April 19, 2005 -- VATICAN-CONCLAVE-1 -- Sisters with the order Lamb of God look in the direction of the chimney over the Sistine Chapel waiting for the telltale smoke to indicate the Cardinals voting on a new pope, Tuesday, April 19, 2005 in St. Peter's Square in Vatican City. (James Hill/The New York Times) *MAGS OUT/NO SALES*
Comment: How the conclave of cardinals will chose next pope

Locked in the Sistine Chapel, 138 members of the College of Cardinals will select a new pontiff.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, April 27

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Offer religious study outside of the school day

Everett school district taxpayers spend millions of dollars every year funding school… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.