Comment: ‘Fight for $15’ is already won; with or without law

Even if Congress can’t pass a $15 an hour minimum wage, industry and workers know it’s the standard now.

By Noah Smith / Bloomberg Opinion

The Democrats in Congress will probably fail to pass a federal $15 an hour minimum wage. Amazingly, this might end up not mattering that much. The drive for $15 has succeeded simply by resetting Americans’ idea of what a reasonable wage should be.

In an age of grass-roots political campaigns, the Fight for $15 has been startlingly effective. It succeeded in getting a $15 minimum wage passed in Seattle, in California, and in a variety of other cities and states. Its message was simple, focused and — at least in the places where it has prevailed — reasonable.

In addition to having a catchy, alliterative slogan, Fight for $15 had some pretty decent economics on its side. The fact that “teenagers like cheeseburgers,” in the words of economist John Kennan, probably reduces the effect of minimum wage hikes on employment; the increased income from higher minimum wage feeds back into the economy, raising labor demand. And as economists have increasingly realized in recent years, minimum wage can help counteract employers’ power to hold wages below their efficient market value. It can still hurt employment, but the threshold for doing so is probably a lot higher than opponents worry.

At the national level, Fight for $15 hasn’t yet managed to chalk a win. The minimum-wage proposal was struck from President Biden’s recent covid-19 relief bill on the grounds that it wasn’t a fiscal measure and thus not eligible to be passed through budget reconciliation. Since reconciliation is the only way to get around the filibuster, that means that a federal $15 minimum wage has only a slim chance of passing during Biden’s presidency. Worries that $15 would go too far in low-cost areas will mean sufficient opposition at the federal level that we probably will not see this sort of bill pass soon; or if a wage hike does pass, expect something significantly less than $15.

Yet despite this failure, Fight for $15 is winning a different way: by altering the norms of wage-setting in the United States. Fast-food merchant McDonald’s Corp., the archetypical low-wage employer, just announced that it will raise its average wages to $15 an hour by 2024. This follows a similar move by Chipotle. Amazon raised its minimum wage to $15 back in 2018. Costco, Starbucks, and a variety of other companies have similar policies. Some big companies like Walmart are still fighting against the new $15 standard, but you can definitely feel the tide turning.

Notice that not all of these wage increases are the same; some represent average company wages, while others represent a minimum floor for pay. But all of them involve the same number: $15. This suggests that the psychological impact of that number has exerted a psychic power over corporate America, and over workers’ wage demands and expectations. Collectively, we’ve simply decided that $15 is the standard minimum for what any job ought to pay.

Economists have long recognized that human psychology plays an important role in the setting of wages. Nobel winner George Akerlof theorized that employers and employees saw wages partially as a sort of “gift exchange”: a fair day’s work for a fair day’s pay. Some have argued that wage norms shifted up in the 1960s boom and down again in the 1980s recessions, shaping the trends for years to come.

It’s possible that before covid, these norms were already shifting, helping — along with Fight for $15’s legal victories in states and cities — to drive up wages at the bottom of the distribution. In April, wages rose at an unusually rapid clip in nominal terms. In real terms, those gains were eaten up by accelerating inflation; real wages haven’t budged in 2021 yet, and it will probably be months until they do. But remember that the $15 number isn’t inflation-adjusted either, so it’s possible that nominal wages really are rising to meet this psychologically important number.

The spread of the $15 standard is a testament to the power of the Fight for $15 campaign, but also to its limitations. Because $15 isn’t adjusted for inflation, a period of rapid consumer prices increases could render the wage victory useless in terms of increasing workers’ real purchasing power. In fact, if inflation stays high, the $15 anchor could ultimately prove counterproductive, making it hard to raise wages even higher to keep up with prices; “fight for $18.50” just doesn’t have the same ring.

Hopefully inflation is a blip, and the $15 wage norm has taken deep root in the American psyche. The 2010s saw low-wage workers start to make up some of the ground they had lost in the wage stagnation of the 2000s, but it wasn’t enough. If the power of human psychology can be harnessed to change what it means to pay a fair wage in America today, so much the better.

Noah Smith is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. He was an assistant professor of finance at Stony Brook University, and he blogs at Noahpinion.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Friday, Sept. 6

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Vote 2024. US American presidential election 2024. Vote inscription, badge, sticker. Presidential election banner Vote 2024, poster, sign. Political election campaign symbol. Vector Illustration
Editorial: Goehner, Steele for 12th LD Senate, House posts

Both Republicans offer experience and an ability to work across aisle on issues of importance.

Schwab: Like wearing flip-flops to a cemetery

Trump didn’t wear flip-flops to Arlington, of course; he saved them for his stance on abortion.

Blow: Trump team desperately scrounging for Harris-Walz scandals

Surprises are always possible, but as yet, nothing slung at the Democratic ticket seems to have landed.

Shame on Optum for cuts to Medicaid child patients

It’s shocking, appalling, and needs answering, why Optum, while making hefty profits… Continue reading

Did letter about abortion violate health privacy law?

I am writing in reference to a letter published recently, concerning Planned… Continue reading

Snohomish County Executive Dave Somers and Senator Maria Cantrell shake hands as they board the 12:30 pm train during the Lynnwood 1 Line extension opening celebrations on Friday, Aug. 30, 2024 in Lynnwood, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Light rail reshaping the future of Snohomish County

The arrival of service to Mountlake Terrace and Lynnwood brings changes for travel, housing and more.

The Alfieris (from left) Jayden, Gabe, Jordan, DeeDee, Jose and Chuck. Over the last 30 years, DeeDee and Chuck have cared for 122 foster children in their Stanwood home, adopting seven of them.
Editorial: ‘You guys always made it a family thing’

Over the last 30 years, DeeDee and Chuck Alfieri have cared for 122 foster children, adopting seven.

background, no people, copy space
Editorial: Short statements could make all difference on ballot

Voters deserve even a little information on their ballots regarding the decisions they’re making.

Shouldn’t have bought a paper you couldn’t sustain

I have read coverage regarding “food deserts” and “news deserts” but never… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Sept. 5

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Tuesday’s debate will be a crucial test for Harris

For undecided voters, the vice president will need to flesh out how well she can lead the nation.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.