Comment: Studies question ‘regret’ after transgender surgeries

One recent study showed less than 1 percent receiving gender-affirming care regretted the decision.

By Harry Barbee / For The Conversation

You’ll often hear lawmakers, activists and pundits argue that many transgender people regret their decision to have gender-affirming surgeries; a belief that’s been fueling a wave of legislation that restricts access to gender-affirming health care.

Gender-affirming care can include surgical procedures such as facial reconstruction, chest or “top” surgery, and genital or “bottom” surgery.

But in an article we recently published in JAMA Surgery, we challenge the notion that transgender people often regret gender-affirming surgeries.

Evidence suggests that less than 1 percent of transgender people who undergo gender-affirming surgery report regret. That proportion is even more striking when compared to the fact that 14.4 percent of the broader population reports regret after similar surgeries for reasons other than transgender care.

For example, studies have found that between 5 percent and 14 percent of all women who receive mastectomies to reduce the risk of developing breast cancer say they regretted doing so. However, less than 1 percent of transgender men who receive the same procedure report regret.

These statistics are based on reviews of existing studies that investigated regret among 7,928 transgender individuals who received gender-affirming surgeries. Although some of this prior research has been criticized for overlooking the fact that regret can sometimes take years to develop, it aligns with the growing body of studies that show positive health outcomes among transgender people who receive gender-affirming care.

Why access to gender-affirming surgery matters: About 1.6 million people in the U.S. identify as transgender. While only about 25 percent of these individuals have obtained gender-affirming surgeries, these procedures have become more commonplace. From 2016 to 2020, roughly 48,000 trans people in the U.S. received gender-affirming surgeries.

These procedures provide transgender people with the opportunity to align their physical bodies with their gender identity, which could positively impact mental health. Research shows that access to gender-affirming surgeries may reduce levels of depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation among transgender people.

The mental health benefits may explain the low levels of regret. Transgender people have far higher rates of mental health concerns than cisgender people, or people whose gender identity aligns with their sex at birth. This is largely because transgender people have a more difficult time living authentically without experiencing discrimination, harassment and violence.

Gender-affirming surgery often involves going through a number of hoops: waiting periods, hormone therapy and learning about the potential risks and benefits of the procedures. Although most surgeries are reserved for adults, the leading guidelines recommend that patients be at least 15 years old.

This thorough process that trans people go through before receiving surgery may also explain the lower levels of regret.

In addition, many cisgender people get surgeries that, in their ideal world, they wouldn’t receive. But they go through with the surgery in order to prevent a health problem.

For instance, a cisgender woman who receives a mastectomy to avoid breast cancer may ultimately regret the decision if she dislikes her new appearance. Meanwhile, a transgender man who receives the same procedure is more likely to be pleased with a masculine-looking chest.

Improving research and public policy: It’s important to note that this research is not conclusive. Views of surgeries can change over time, and patients can feel quite differently about their outcomes eight years after their surgery as opposed to one year after their surgery.

Nonetheless, the consensus among experts, including at the American Medical Association, is that gender-affirming surgery can improve transgender people’s health and should not be banned.

States such as Oklahoma and North Dakota have ignored this consensus and have restricted access to these procedures. In response, 12 states, including Washington state, have designated themselves “sanctuaries” for gender-affirming care.

Although our statistics on surgical regret may change as researchers learn more, they are the best data that health care providers have. And public policies that are based on the best available evidence have the most potential to improve people’s lives.

Harry Barbee is an assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Jan. 31

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Jayden Hill, 15, an incoming sophomore at Monroe High School is reflected in the screen of a cellphone on Wednesday, July 10, 2024 in Monroe, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Students need limits on cellphones in school

School districts needn’t wait for legislation to start work on policies to limit phones in class.

Schwab: If democracy falls in silent coup does it make a sound

Amid unconstitutional orders and ignored laws and backgrounds you might hear exasperated bafflement.

Douthat: Conflicts in Trump’s court D.C.’s new political battles

Count on the factions among Trump’s courtiers to have more impact than what happens in Congress.

Comment: Senators, immunize against RFK Jr.’s vaccine hypocrisy

Claiming to support vaccine ‘safety’ isn’t a reasoned position; it’s attempt to obfuscate his past positions.

Comment: How China’s DeepSeek opened up AI better than OpenAI

It should worry Sam Altman and other tech giants who insisted on demanding money and opacity.

Comment: Because he’s president doesn’t mean he’s right

Trump’s slim plurality of the electorate is no mandate and no reason to silence our convictions.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Jan. 30

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

What can high schools do about blow-out scores?

While reading the Herald’s sports prep roundup the other day I was… Continue reading

Resist Trump policies by standing with Budde, Brown

Recently, Episcopal Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde gave the sermon at the National… Continue reading

Bouie: Hand back the purse, Mr. President

The Founders made it clear: Congress controls the power of the purse; not the president.

Comment: Trump’s firing of IGs aims for Supreme Court mandate

Trump is betting justices will give him the power to hire and fire more federal employees at will.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.