Comment: Studies question ‘regret’ after transgender surgeries

One recent study showed less than 1 percent receiving gender-affirming care regretted the decision.

By Harry Barbee / For The Conversation

You’ll often hear lawmakers, activists and pundits argue that many transgender people regret their decision to have gender-affirming surgeries; a belief that’s been fueling a wave of legislation that restricts access to gender-affirming health care.

Gender-affirming care can include surgical procedures such as facial reconstruction, chest or “top” surgery, and genital or “bottom” surgery.

But in an article we recently published in JAMA Surgery, we challenge the notion that transgender people often regret gender-affirming surgeries.

Evidence suggests that less than 1 percent of transgender people who undergo gender-affirming surgery report regret. That proportion is even more striking when compared to the fact that 14.4 percent of the broader population reports regret after similar surgeries for reasons other than transgender care.

For example, studies have found that between 5 percent and 14 percent of all women who receive mastectomies to reduce the risk of developing breast cancer say they regretted doing so. However, less than 1 percent of transgender men who receive the same procedure report regret.

These statistics are based on reviews of existing studies that investigated regret among 7,928 transgender individuals who received gender-affirming surgeries. Although some of this prior research has been criticized for overlooking the fact that regret can sometimes take years to develop, it aligns with the growing body of studies that show positive health outcomes among transgender people who receive gender-affirming care.

Why access to gender-affirming surgery matters: About 1.6 million people in the U.S. identify as transgender. While only about 25 percent of these individuals have obtained gender-affirming surgeries, these procedures have become more commonplace. From 2016 to 2020, roughly 48,000 trans people in the U.S. received gender-affirming surgeries.

These procedures provide transgender people with the opportunity to align their physical bodies with their gender identity, which could positively impact mental health. Research shows that access to gender-affirming surgeries may reduce levels of depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation among transgender people.

The mental health benefits may explain the low levels of regret. Transgender people have far higher rates of mental health concerns than cisgender people, or people whose gender identity aligns with their sex at birth. This is largely because transgender people have a more difficult time living authentically without experiencing discrimination, harassment and violence.

Gender-affirming surgery often involves going through a number of hoops: waiting periods, hormone therapy and learning about the potential risks and benefits of the procedures. Although most surgeries are reserved for adults, the leading guidelines recommend that patients be at least 15 years old.

This thorough process that trans people go through before receiving surgery may also explain the lower levels of regret.

In addition, many cisgender people get surgeries that, in their ideal world, they wouldn’t receive. But they go through with the surgery in order to prevent a health problem.

For instance, a cisgender woman who receives a mastectomy to avoid breast cancer may ultimately regret the decision if she dislikes her new appearance. Meanwhile, a transgender man who receives the same procedure is more likely to be pleased with a masculine-looking chest.

Improving research and public policy: It’s important to note that this research is not conclusive. Views of surgeries can change over time, and patients can feel quite differently about their outcomes eight years after their surgery as opposed to one year after their surgery.

Nonetheless, the consensus among experts, including at the American Medical Association, is that gender-affirming surgery can improve transgender people’s health and should not be banned.

States such as Oklahoma and North Dakota have ignored this consensus and have restricted access to these procedures. In response, 12 states, including Washington state, have designated themselves “sanctuaries” for gender-affirming care.

Although our statistics on surgical regret may change as researchers learn more, they are the best data that health care providers have. And public policies that are based on the best available evidence have the most potential to improve people’s lives.

Harry Barbee is an assistant professor at the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Workers at MW's Cascade Recycling Center in Woodinville remove large unrecyclable materials, like plastic sheeting, from a conveyor belt. Optical scanners and other equipment sort most of the material processed at the center. (The Herald)
Editorial: Encourage recycling by increasing use of material

Recycling legislation can create a better market for material by increasing its use in packaging.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, March 3

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Some of Musk’s DOGE damage can’t be undone

The courts will likely halt his work, but agency officials are likely to formalize the cuts legally.

Friedman: Trump, Vance make clear who’s side they’re on

Never has a U.S. president backed the aggressor in a major war, ignoring even his county’s own interests.

Comment: Wishful thinking won’t solve U.S. debt crisis

Putting off spending cuts and tax increases will only get harder in the coming decades.

Comment: Trump fanned inflation’s flames, now they may burn him

His own policies and partisan politics may conspire to keep inflation from going lower and could push it higher.

Liz Skinner, right, and Emma Titterness, both from Domestic Violence Services of Snohomish County, speak with a man near the Silver Lake Safeway while conducting a point-in-time count Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2024, in Everett, Washington. The man, who had slept at that location the previous night, was provided some food and a warming kit after participating in the PIT survey. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: A chance to balance interests of homeless, cities

A bill in the state House would require camping ordinances to meet ‘objectively reasonable’ standards.

Feral Cat Spay/Neuter Project volunteer Kris Niznik, left, helps clinic technician Joan Hovis prep cats for their spay and neuters on Thursday, Feb. 20, 2025 in Lynnwood, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Feral or tame, project gets fix on unfixed cats

Feral Cat Project’s new Lynnwood clinic aids work to spay and neuter cats to control their numbers.

Traffic moves across the US 2 trestle between Everett and Lake Stevens on Wednesday, Oct. 9, 2024. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Steer clear of the state’s gas tax dead end

The gas tax is bringing in less revenue for transportation needs. A per-mile fee is the answer.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, March 2

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE  — Members of the American Federation of Government Employees rally outside the U.S. Capitol building in Washington, Feb. 11, 2025. A group of 21 civil servants with technology expertise resigned on Feb. 25 rather than help implement an array of changes to the federal government being pushed by the billionaire Elon Musk and his so-called Department of Government Efficiency. (Samuel Corum/The New York Times)
Comment: A government Americans won’t recognize

Cuts to regulations and programs will leave markets unchecked and dismantle services Americans value.

Trumps cuts to Forest Service will harm our ‘backyard’

I’m urging the people of Snohomish County to contact your local representatives… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.