Comment: Using forests for carbon credits may defeat purpose

By blocking some state forests from timber production, the project limits an effective climate tool.

By Nick Smith / For The Herald

Everyone agrees Washington’s forests are key to helping the state reach its climate goals. Thanks to the continuous cycle of forestry, which includes the planting, growing, harvesting and manufacturing of wood products, our working forests already achieve net-zero carbon emissions. They also support thousands of green jobs and prevent the conversion of forests to non-forests.

Unfortunately, the Department of Natural Resources’ new carbon-offset project disregards international consensus around forestry and wood products. It may have the unintended consequence of enlarging the state’s carbon footprint, because it discourages harvest of Washington-grown wood. This effectively promotes wood imports and greater use of concrete and steel.

Ultimately, it will be rural communities that pay the price for a policy that will have a negligible impact on global greenhouse gas emissions, while providing a fraction of the revenue for public services.

The DNR manages 2.2 million acres of public working forests known as state trust lands to harvest timber and provide revenues for defined beneficiaries including schools, counties, fire districts, ports, hospitals and other community service providers. Every year, sustainable timber harvests on these working forests generate nearly $200 million annually for public services.

As working forests, these lands are managed under modern forest practice rules and a State Lands Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) that is supposed to ensure a continuous timber supply, while also providing for clean water, habitat for wildlife and recreational opportunities. All of these policies were developed through a public process.

As a result, nearly half of DNR trust lands in Western Washington are no longer available for sustainable timber management because of conservation plans and past decisions to protect old and mature trees. These policies promised to provide certainty for the continuous management of the remaining forest lands.

DNR’s carbon project was not developed through a public process. There are many unanswered questions of how it will work, whether it will lead to actual carbon emission reductions, and how it will impact state trust land beneficiaries and the rural communities that are likely to be impacted through reduced jobs, economic activity and access to public services.

The Herald’s April 12 editorial likened the project to getting “an oil refinery, for example, to pay to leave a forest standing to do its work for the climate and fund schools and more at the same time.”

This political decision presumably benefits the oil refinery because it maintains the status quo and allows the refinery to continue doing its business. But it is troublesome for those Washington companies that need wood from these working forests to make the only building material that is renewable, requires fewer fossil fuels (oil) to produce, and one that actually stores carbon.

Whether we are producing cross-laminated timber or traditional lumber, Washington state needs a forest sector with viable logging and milling capacity to remain competitive, provide affordable wood products and create family-wage jobs in rural communities. With timber volume on state trust lands already in decline, further reducing timber harvest puts this industry and the jobs at risk.

Without a strong forest sector, Washington loses its leadership in green building and sustainable forestry. We lose our ability to make Washington-grown wood products, treat at-risk forests and we increase our carbon footprint by replacing these products with those produced from other countries that do not share our high environmental standards.

The DNR carbon project may seem like a political winner, but it fails to take the long view toward solutions that are already working to sequester and store carbon, while providing green jobs as well as economic activity and revenues for public schools and community services.

Nick Smith is Public Affairs Director for the American Forest Resource Council, representing Washington’s forest sector that depends on timber management on DNR state trust lands.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, April 26

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

County Council members Jared Mead, left, and Nate Nehring speak to students on Thursday, Jan. 30, 2025, during Civic Education Day at the Snohomish County Campus in Everett, Washington. (Will Geschke / The Herald)
Editorial: Students get a life lesson in building bridges

Two county officials’ civics campaign is showing the possibilities of discourse and government.

Roberts: Gutting of scientific research will leave us blind

The Trump administration’s deep cuts to science and research will harm our economy and environment.

Comment: Funding delays jeopardize research of healthy aging

A freeze of NIH funding threatens research into aging and Alzheimer’s at the UW School of Medicine.

Comment: Meaningful law on rent requires bill’s earlier version

As lawmakers seek a deal, rent stabilization should keep a 7 percent cap and apply to single homes.

Forum: Trump cuts to museum funding hit Imagine Children’s

The defunding of a museum and library program means the loss of a science lab for preschoolers.

Forum: We strive for Belonging, then keep it to ourselves

From childhood we treat Belonging as something to be jealously guarded. What if others belong, too?

Comment: Higher tax on tobacco pouches could backfire

A proposed 95 percent tax on smokeless tobacco could lead some back to more dangerous cigarettes.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, April 25

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

FILE - This Feb. 6, 2015, file photo, shows a measles, mumps and rubella vaccine on a countertop at a pediatrics clinic in Greenbrae, Calif. Washington state lawmakers voted Tuesday, April 23, 2019 to remove parents' ability to claim a personal or philosophical exemption from vaccinating their children for measles, although medical and religious exemptions will remain. (AP Photo/Eric Risberg, File)
Editorial: Commonsense best shot at avoiding measles epidemic

Without vaccination, misinformation, hesitancy and disease could combine for a deadly epidemic.

The Buzz: This week, the makeup tips of political powerbrokers

Who would have guessed that Kitara Revanche and Pete Hegseth used the same brand of concealer?

Schwab: Who saw this coming? said no one but Senate Republicans

Take your pick of agency heads; for those who advise and consent, there was no sign of trouble ahead.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.