Internet buzz drowns out journalism’s gatekeepers

  • William Raspberry / Washington Post Columnist
  • Sunday, October 24, 2004 9:00pm
  • Opinion

WASHINGTON – The information explosion occasioned by the World Wide Web – putting at the fingertips of schoolchildren information that would have been inaccessible to Ph.D. researchers a generation ago – has the potential to make us all smarter, to free us from the tyranny of those who would limit our access to truth, to empower us.

But it has made serious journalism – political journalism in particular – a hundred times more difficult.

Rem Rieder, editor of the American Journalism Review, lays out the major difficulty in the current issue of AJR:

“How do you handle controversial, explosive charges made in the heat of a political campaign by people with painfully obvious axes to grind?”

It was the charges made in an ad by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth that prompted Rieder’s examination, but it could have been – and assuredly will be – any number of spurious (or at any rate unproven) allegations.

To understand why it is more difficult (for mainstream journalism) than it used to be, think back a dozen years to Gennifer Flowers. The rumors that the nightclub singer had been involved in a long-running affair with (then) presidential candidate Bill Clinton had been flying for months. Reporters, having tried and failed to nail them down, didn’t publish them.

But the tabloid Star did – in a story for which it paid Flowers.

That story – and the buzz it produced – provided the basis for an ABC “Nightline” show which the hugely respected Ted Koppel devoted to, essentially, Rieder’s question: What are the mainstream media to do when the tabloids publish blockbuster stories driven by people with axes to grind?

Koppel posed it as a serious, even philosophical, question. But of course he had to lay out the specifics of the Star story so his assembled panel of serious journalists could respond to them. The result was that mainstream “Nightline” reported precisely the same story as the tabloid Star – the only difference being, as I remarked at the time, that Koppel did it with a long face.

Afterward, of course, every news outlet ran with the story.

In 1996, to take another example, the San Jose Mercury News ran a major story alleging that the CIA played a leading role in introducing crack cocaine into America’s ghettos. In no time at all, the Internet was abuzz with the story – not a word of which had surfaced in The Washington Post.

I remember asking a senior editor at the Post if he didn’t think the story merited coverage, if only because “everybody” was talking about it. The response was to the effect that he wasn’t prepared to let less-careful editors than he deploy his resources. It was a reasonable position which, in the event, proved unsustainable. The Post wound up not only covering the story but launching its own independent investigation – not because it had discovered new information but because the story had taken on a life of its own.

Much the same thing happened a few weeks ago when the Post, driven by persistent postings on the Web, sought to debunk a story to the effect that no airliner crashed into the Pentagon on Sept. 11 – that the damage was done by an American-launched missile.

If more or less ordinary citizens – “netizens” – could drive the CIA-crack story or the 9/11 fantasy into the mainstream press, imagine what a well-financed, politically motivated, smartly directed campaign could do. That, essentially, is what happened with the Swift boat veterans.

Indeed, for me the most important complaint about mainstream coverage of the Swift boat affair was not that it was ignored, but that mainstream journalists waited too long to get beyond the they-said-he-said “objective” reporting and try to figure out who was closer to the truth.

What has changed in the years since Gennifer Flowers, says Rieder, is that a handful of national newspapers no longer can operate as journalistic gatekeepers – effectively blocking stories that are unverified or unverifiable and driven by people whose political motivations are plain to see.

The explosion of the Internet leaves us, in effect, with no gatekeeper. Sometimes important information gains currency that way. The problem is that anyone with Web access can run any cockamamie story up the flagpole – and if enough people salute, deploy the resources of the mainstream press.

It’s that bad – and it isn’t likely to get better any time soon.

William Raspberry is a Washington Post columnist. Contact him by writing to willrasp@washpost.com.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Everett Mayor Ray Stephenson, center, talks with Alaska Airlines Inc. CEO Brad Tilden after the groundbreaking ceremony for the new Paine Field passenger terminal on Monday, June 5, 2017 in Everett, Wa. (Andy Bronson / The Herald)
Editorial: Alliance makes renewed pitch for economic efforts

Leading in the interim, former Everett mayor Ray Stephanson is back as a catalyst for growth.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Jan. 14

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Participants in Northwest WA Civic Circle's discussion among city council members and state lawmakers (clockwise from left) Mountlake Terrace City Council member Dr. Steve Woodard, Stanwood Mayor Sid Roberts, Edmonds City Council member Susan Paine, Rep. April Berg, D-Mill Creek; Herald Opinion editor Jon Bauer, Mountlake Terrace City Council member Erin Murray, Edmonds City Council member Neil Tibbott, Civic Circle founder Alica Crank, and Rep. Shelly Kolba, D-Kenmore.
Editorial: State, local leaders chew on budget, policy needs

Civic Circle, a new nonprofit, invites the public into a discussion of local government needs, taxes and tools.

Douthat: Merger of U.S., Canada may be in interests of both

With an unclear future ahead of it, it has more to gain as part of the U.S. than as its neighbor.

Friedman: Trump’s reckless Greenland comments no joke to Taiwan

The president-elect could be making things difficult for himself in discouraging China’s plans for Taiwan.

Comment: Trust and Carter receive their eulogies

Carter once promised he would never lie. Trump’s second term proves how little such declarations matter.

Comment: Congress cleared way for Trump’s tariffs; in 1977

The final hurdle for Trump’s tariff whims hangs on how the Supreme Court rules on two cases.

toon
Editorial: News media must brave chill that some threaten

And readers should stand against moves by media owners and editors to placate President-elect Trump.

FILE - The afternoon sun illuminates the Legislative Building, left, at the Capitol in Olympia, Wash., Oct. 9, 2018. Three conservative-backed initiatives that would give police greater ability to pursue people in vehicles, declare a series of rights for parents of public-school students and bar an income tax were approved by the Washington state Legislature on Monday, March 4, 2024.   (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: Legislation that deserves another look in Olympia

Along with resolving budgets, state lawmakers should reconsider bills that warrant further review.

Comment: Quick action on Trump’s ‘one big’ bill faces headwinds

Even if split in two, enough opposition divides even Republicans on tax cuts, the debt ceiling and more.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Jan. 13

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Comment: Blaming everything but climate change for wildfires

To listen to Trump and others, the disasters’ fault lies with a smelt, DEI and government space lasers.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.