Milbank: Trump doesn’t like it, but protests are our right

The shouts of protest at the Kavanaugh hearing are irritating but entirely American and justified.

By Dana Milbank

“Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble.”

— First Amendment to the Constitution, ratified Dec. 15, 1791

“I don’t know why they don’t take care of a situation like that. I think it’s embarrassing for the country to allow protesters.”

— President Trump, Sept. 4, 2018

On Wednesday, the morning after the president proclaimed that civil disobedience should no longer be tolerated in America, I chose a seat at Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing right next to the source of President Trump’s rage: the public gallery, where American citizens had stood all Tuesday to voice their objections to the nominee and the Supreme Court confirmation process.

Like clockwork, the protest resumed in the first minute, right after Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, blamed Democrats (without evidence) for the disruption because the 70 people arrested Tuesday were “following their lead.”

Now the shouts had returned:

“What are you hiding?”

“No Trump puppet!”

“Save our democracy!”

Capitol Police removed and arrested the demonstrators — 31 of them by lunchtime. Photographers scanned the audience for the next protester to pop up, whack-a-mole style. Yet the hearing went on. The Republic survived.

A foreign journalist sitting near me marveled at the civil disobedience. “You pull that s*** in Venezuela?” she said, then drew her index finger across her throat.

That’s true in many of the countries whose leaders Trump praises: Russia, China, Saudi Arabia, the Philippines, North Korea. Now he suggests protests should be abolished here, too. No civil rights movement. No anti-war protests. No Henry David Thoreau fighting slavery. No Boston Tea Party.

On Wednesday morning, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, picked up Trump’s theme: “I just wish we could have a hearing where the nominee’s kids could show up. … What kind of country have we become?” Graham asked Kavanaugh what he told his children about Tuesday’s spectacle.

A worthy nominee would have told his daughters this: “The people who were shouting do not like President Trump and do not want me to be on the Supreme Court. But even though I disagree with them, I will defend their ability to speak out, because nonviolent protest is part of being an American.”

Instead, Kavanaugh declined to say what he told his daughters, merely testifying that they “gave me a big hug and said, ‘Good job, Daddy.’”

From the back of the room, a heckler shouted: “The nominee’s kids are being able to observe democracy because …”

She didn’t finish the sentence before she was evicted.

Violent protest is never acceptable, and the best protest — the kind registered at the polls — hopefully will occur in November. The popular fury at the Kavanaugh hearing is irritating and inconvenient. But it is also entirely American — and fully justified:

One party in an evenly divided government refused for almost 10 months to seat a Supreme Court nominee of the other party, then changed the rules to push through two nominees from a president of their own party.

The power play is being executed by a minority government — a legislative caucus and a president elected despite losing the popular vote — seeking to sustain its minority power with a Supreme Court that shields Republicans from the popular will with rulings on voting rights, gerrymandering and campaign finance.

The party in power is withholding documents about the nominee and hiding others by unilaterally declaring them “confidential.”

There are persistent indications that the president may have been shopping for a friendly judge in case his legal troubles come before the court.

The anger in the public gallery reminds me of the House Obamacare vote in 2010, when conservative demonstrators outside, whipped up by GOP lawmakers from the House balcony, were so riled that Democratic lawmakers came to the Capitol under police protection. When hecklers in the House chamber interrupted the debate with shouts of “Kill the bill!” and “The people said no!,” Republican lawmakers cheered; for the hecklers.

Now the anger is on the other side, and Republicans aren’t cheering. The committee did its best to quiet demonstrators, leaving public seats empty for long periods, even though would-be spectators were lined up outside the room and outside the building.

But hour after hour, fresh demonstrators kept coming, and each time a few more were admitted, the shouts resumed:

“This is a scam!”

“Why don’t you listen to us?”

“The American people have no faith in you.”

Trump would quash such dissent. But America is still free, and the people will be heard.

Follow Dana Milbank on Twitter @Milbank.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, April 28

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

County Council members Jared Mead, left, and Nate Nehring speak to students on Thursday, Jan. 30, 2025, during Civic Education Day at the Snohomish County Campus in Everett, Washington. (Will Geschke / The Herald)
Editorial: Students get a life lesson in building bridges

Two county officials’ civics campaign is showing the possibilities of discourse and government.

Comment: Musk doesn’t understand what Lincoln knew

That government should do the things that individuals and markets can’t or won’t do. That’s not waste, fraud or abuse.

Brooks: Trump’s greatest strength can also be his downfall

Trump has succeeded in his first 100 days by moving fast and breaking things. That serves his opposition.

Harrop: How can Elon Musk be a genius yet so clueless?

Now that President Trump has what he needs from him, Musk is being discarded, and poorer for it.

Comment: Stifling climate anxiety only ignores the problem

If we want kids to be less anxious about climate change, educate them and show them there are solutions.

(NYT1) VATICAN CITY, April 19, 2005 -- VATICAN-CONCLAVE-1 -- Sisters with the order Lamb of God look in the direction of the chimney over the Sistine Chapel waiting for the telltale smoke to indicate the Cardinals voting on a new pope, Tuesday, April 19, 2005 in St. Peter's Square in Vatican City. (James Hill/The New York Times) *MAGS OUT/NO SALES*
Comment: How the conclave of cardinals will chose next pope

Locked in the Sistine Chapel, 138 members of the College of Cardinals will select a new pontiff.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, April 27

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Offer religious study outside of the school day

Everett school district taxpayers spend millions of dollars every year funding school… Continue reading

Greene has background, skills for Everett mayor’s office

I am endorsing Dr. Janice Greene for Mayor for the City of… Continue reading

Thanks for a fun, positive story about a young author

A recent front-page story was very encouraging and uplifting to read (“Edmonds… Continue reading

Let Trump tax cuts expire to trim deficits

The 2017 tax cuts that President Trump pushed through Congress are set… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.