Performance-audit law doesn’t need changing

When Washington voters overwhelmingly approved performance audits of public agencies in a 2005 initiative, they created a revenue stream out of existing tax revenue for the state auditor to use in conducting them.

Now a bill has advanced in the Legislature that would use that same revenue stream to reimburse some agencies — school districts and educational service districts, specifically — for the costs they incur during a performance audit.

State Auditor Brian Sonntag strongly opposes this idea (contained in Senate Bill 6450), and we’re with him. It risks undercutting the effectiveness of performance audits, and thus the accountability and potential taxpayer savings they bring.

Performance auditors let agencies know in advance the information they’ll need, and it’s generally information the agency already has, said Jerry Pugnetti, Sonntag’s policy adviser. Costs to the agency should be of no more concern than the costs routinely incurred complying with public records requests.

If this bill, which made it out of the Senate education committee Thursday, becomes law, it’s a sure bet other agencies will demand the same reimbursements in the future. School districts and educational service districts are just a sympathetic place to start.

Sonntag fears that issuing what would amount to a blank check could prompt some agencies to overcalculate their costs and simply stick his office with the bill, diminishing the resources he has to conduct future performance audits. He also worries it could lead to costly delays, because audited agencies wouldn’t have an incentive to provide information quickly and cost-effectively.

In fact, it would eliminate any incentive for agencies to keep their audit costs to a minimum. Why worry about costs when someone else is paying?

Voters knew what they were doing when they approved Initiative 900. They were demanding accountability, and provided a way to pay for it. It’s just beginning to work. Lawmakers will only incur voters’ wrath if they start monkeying with it now.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Dec. 21

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A state Climate Commmitment Act map shows projects funded by the act's carbon auctions.
Editorial: Climate Commitment Act a two-fer for Washington

Its emissions auctions put price on carbon and use that revenue for climate investments.

Paramount Pictures
George Bailey (Jimmy Stewart, center) is consoled by Mr. Martini after believing $8,000 of his company's money has been lost.
Comment: Welcome to Pottersville, U.S.A.; Population: us

There are disturbing parallels between our times and that of the dystopian town in ‘It’s a Wonderful Life.’

Comment: State funding cuts would devastate long-term care

The Legislature should at least maintain Medicaid funding for nursing facilities at current levels.

Comment: No trust due an administration that ended river pact

The White House killed a negotiated deal to save salmon. The rivers’ protectors must return to court.

Comment: $20-an-hour pay for fast food workers will kill jobs

To protect employment, other states should avoid adopting California’s 2024 wage law.

Charles Adkins
Forum: To make investments we need, wealthy can pay fair share

As state lawmakers consider budgets, they should reconsider proposals for more progressive taxes.

Water from the Snohomish River surrounds a residence along the west side of Lowell Snohomish River Road on Thursday, Dec. 11, 2025 in Snohomish, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Keep eye on weather and on FEMA’s future

Recent flooding should give pause to those who believe federal disaster aid is unnecessary.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, Dec. 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

toon
Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Dec. 20

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Schwab: What best fits a diagnosis of derangement?

Could it be vile attacks on the victims of tragedy? Vilification of immigrants? Economic denial?

Saunders: A plus for Trump 2.0: Far less firing among his staff

Turnover in the White House in his second term is far lower than his first. The stability is welcome.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.